I would have been more impressed if you had not over reached as to the implications of the write up.
Facts are all that matter, and the fact is, the article was devoid of facts tying the Clinton's to a crime. When one goes out on a limb, beware of who (the MSM) is behind you with the saw.
The article was so bloody boring, the average reader will never make it (with good reason) beyond the first paragraph.
Thanks for all your hard work here on FreeRepublic. Where would FR be without you?
After reading the article I was left with ok SO? The focus was more on the 3 fund raisers and them being crooks, making the Clintons look like the victims. Where is the proof they committed a crime and knew? Am I missing something here?
Please speak for yourself, I did not find it boring in the least. But then, I maybe I am not the average reader. It is imperative that Hillary Clinton be exposed for the corrupt criminal she is, and always has been. I for one, am not going to just wring my hands.