Skip to comments.
Fate Of Soledad Cross Questioned
10 News ^
| October 7, 2005
| Unknown
Posted on 10/08/2005 10:03:30 AM PDT by Jay777
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: Pride in the USA
When and how do the people get to force these activist judges to step down? Why are they ever given a pass, no matter how far from the Constitution they stray? When do they have to answer to the people and a higher authority? In CA, public officials such as these Superior Court judges can be subject to Recall, as was well publicized when ex-Gov. Davis was recalled in 2003. Perhaps this is the only way that may work.
They are also subject to reaffirmation by yes/no vote on the ballot every 12 years or so, butthat rarely works because nobody knows who the judges are, so they usually all get reelected by 75% or so. Maybe they are also subject to impeachment, but I doubt that could happen in this case.
21
posted on
10/08/2005 4:25:31 PM PDT
by
heleny
(Yes on CA Propositions 73, 74, 75)
To: All
Our judge:
Lokks like she stayed up all night coming to this decision.
22
posted on
10/08/2005 4:39:13 PM PDT
by
IonImplantGuru
("Me? You talking to me? You talkin' to me? Then [BLEEP]... Well, I'm the only one here.")
To: Jay777
Artical XVI, Section 5, of the California Constitution.What illiterate moron wrote this? It's spelled Article NOT Artical If this was written by a so called "judge" I would have to question their competence based on their spelling abilities alone.
23
posted on
10/08/2005 9:43:09 PM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: IonImplantGuru
24
posted on
05/04/2006 1:54:58 PM PDT
by
hattend
To: hattend
Good Lord! I made my post
SEVEN months ago! How did you stumble across it now?
25
posted on
05/04/2006 3:51:34 PM PDT
by
IonImplantGuru
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
To: IonImplantGuru
The Cross is back in the news and this thread still comes up in the FR search.
:-)
26
posted on
05/04/2006 3:53:41 PM PDT
by
hattend
To: AlaskaErik
The site was actually discovered 61 years earlier by Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo who had named it San Miguel.
Named after a saint?! OMG!
Actually named after a beer....
27
posted on
05/04/2006 3:56:42 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson