Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor in CIA case taking new tack, lawyers say
The New York Times ^ | October 8, 2005 | David Johnston

Posted on 10/08/2005 8:02:20 AM PDT by YaYa123

WASHINGTON -- The prosecutor in the CIA leak case is exploring a range of possible crimes, lawyers in the case say, suggesting that the investigation has moved well beyond its initial focus on whether anyone in the Bush administration illegally disclosed the identity of a CIA operative. In recent days, the prosecutor, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, has accelerated the pace of his inquiry in an apparent effort to conclude the case before the grand jury's term expires on Oct. 28. He has indicated to several lawyers that he might be preparing to bring charges.

Fitzgerald has asked to meet Tuesday with Judith Miller, a reporter for The New York Times who, after spending 85 days in jail, testified last week to the grand jury about her conversations with I. Lewis Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsobserver.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; fitzgeral; livvy; plamegate; rove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
I don't know why this writer is listed as New York Times, with the url being NewsObserver.

I don't know why the sub-headline reads "Focus may shift from White House", but the article reads as if Fitzgerald's focus remains Livvy and Rove.

1 posted on 10/08/2005 8:02:22 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

But one thing is clear. David Johnson a New York Times reporter, writes about the contents of the notes Judith Miller just found and turned over to Fitzgerald. Johnson couldn't have known about the notes' contents unless Miller told him, and wanted this information "out there"


2 posted on 10/08/2005 8:06:24 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ God Bless President Bush As the MSM and Democrats Seek To Destroy Him.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

'Under the law, any government official or private citizen who transferred classified information could potentially be charged with a felony.'

Sandy Burglar comes to mind.....


3 posted on 10/08/2005 8:06:32 AM PDT by bitt (THE PRESIDENT: "Ask the pollsters. My job is to lead and to solve problems. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
any government official or private citizen who transferred classified information could potentially be charged with a felony.

Classified information?

4 posted on 10/08/2005 8:07:17 AM PDT by Bahbah (Member of the Water Bucket Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

the "classified infomation" being the identity of Valerie Plame, my guess.


5 posted on 10/08/2005 8:09:06 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ God Bless President Bush As the MSM and Democrats Seek To Destroy Him.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

I did not notice the sub-headline until you mentioned it "Focus may shift from White House", but that is very interesting.

So is this line: "Under the law, any government official or private citizen who transferred classified information could potentially be charged with a felony."

Private citizen = reporters? Classified info = Wilson yapping about his wife to reporters?


6 posted on 10/08/2005 8:12:25 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Charges might be lying to a g-man (FBI) or conspiracy. That's what they nailed Martha with


7 posted on 10/08/2005 8:12:44 AM PDT by dennisw (You shouldn't let other people get your kicks for you - Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
I don't know why this writer is listed as New York Times, with the url being NewsObserver.

Like the AP/UPI, the NYT sells their stories.

8 posted on 10/08/2005 8:13:49 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (If Osama Was A Piece Of Ass - Clinton Would Have Nailed Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
There'll be partying galore in the mansions of Chappaqua, Bedford,Greenwich and New Canaan if anyone close to Bush or Cheney is indicted here.
9 posted on 10/08/2005 8:20:04 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
the "classified infomation" being the identity of Valerie Plame, my guess.

The law that "Joe Isuzu" Wilson claimed was broken says that you have to learn about a person's covert status from classified sources/material with which you have been entrusted. That is, you have a clearance and you saw it at work.

A reporter who figures it out from unclassified sources COULD NOT be prosecuted. However, that is exactly what 99% of the press wants to happen here.

So the reporters want to ignore the law as long as we can put Rove in jail. I say "Fine" as long as we can then put reporters in jail using the same rule. Rove will have tons of company.

10 posted on 10/08/2005 8:20:35 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (If Osama Was A Piece Of Ass - Clinton Would Have Nailed Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

"Wilson yapping about his wife to reporters?"

Bingo

11 posted on 10/08/2005 8:20:36 AM PDT by RebelTex (Freedom is everyone's right - and everyone's responsibility!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

OK, I have to say it again, I am fascinated about that sub-headline: "Focus may shift from White House"

Is the NY Times easing us into the true story?


12 posted on 10/08/2005 8:20:44 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex
Cliff May pointed out that Joe Isuzu Wilson's saying, "I did work for the CIA" effectively put his wife under investigation by foreign intelligence. As were all of his friends, family and associates.

If nothing else, it's good that she's not a rogue at the agency sending out dipsticks like Joe running her own diplomatic games.

BTW, her post partum depression was not caused by pregnancy. It was caused by the realization that people will know she had sex with that dweeb.

13 posted on 10/08/2005 8:24:37 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (If Osama Was A Piece Of Ass - Clinton Would Have Nailed Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Can't wait till Oct. 28, 2005 bump!!!


14 posted on 10/08/2005 8:26:42 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

ping.


15 posted on 10/08/2005 8:32:14 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
"Is the NY Times easing us into the true story?"

Sure seems that way. Methinks this 'set up' of Rove is not going to turn out the way the MSM wanted. Hehehehe....

16 posted on 10/08/2005 8:33:56 AM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Huck; samadams2000

FYI. Looks like all roads may lead away from the WH, as suspected. Hehehehe...


17 posted on 10/08/2005 8:35:47 AM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

I wouldn't assume anything so pleasant as The NYT easing us into anything. And who writes the headlines and sub-titles anyway? Chances are it's some formerly ink-stained schmuck on a computer, just trying to fit words into spaces. And in this case, did the headline come from the NYT or from the NewsObserver...I don't know.


18 posted on 10/08/2005 8:36:25 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ God Bless President Bush As the MSM and Democrats Seek To Destroy Him.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
The law that "Joe Isuzu" Wilson claimed was broken...

Hey Doc (good morning), don't slander Isuzu...


19 posted on 10/08/2005 8:41:26 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

duh....finally thought to look this up in today's NYT. Their headline is :

"Prosecutor in Leak Case Is Exploring Range of Crimes"

with no sub-headlines.


20 posted on 10/08/2005 8:44:10 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ God Bless President Bush As the MSM and Democrats Seek To Destroy Him.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson