Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael.SF.
If you are going to use Bork as the yardstick by which all nominees are to be measured in terms of intellect, and Constitutional expertize, then all nominees are going to come up short. If you doubt me, just ask Mr. Bork.

Maybe. But how many do you think he would call "a disaster on every level"? Hmmmm?

87 posted on 10/07/2005 4:25:27 PM PDT by Spiff (Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Spiff
But how many do you think he would call "a disaster on every level"? Hmmmm?

Very few. But then there are very very few Robert Bork's.

I do not mean this to be a shot at Bork, as I do respect the man on many levels. But he has a huge ego (I suppose if I was as brilliant as he was, I would as well). Thus he feels insulted that a person, he deems to be his intellectual inferior, is about to be approved for a job he was considered to be not suited for. That has to really irritate him, which is reflected in his comments.

On a side note, how many 'brilliant' people have you known, who had remarkable shortcomings in some areas? The mathematician with zero social skills or the college professor who dresses like he was dressed by Stevie Wonder on a bad day?

I do believe that an intelligent person, as Miers is, may just bring a level of knowledge and common sense to the position, that we will (hopefully) be thankful for in the future.

177 posted on 10/07/2005 4:53:07 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ('That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson