It's the charge Gillespie seems to be leveling at any that disagrees with the wisdom of this nomination, and others are using as a talking point to attempt to dismiss the opposition.
Ask Ed.
I'm an elitist because I want someone with a proven record of constitutional competence. That can include Harvard (depending on what the student does afterwards), but it can also include Gonzaga Law School, so long as afterwards the candidate actually does something - file briefs, writes articles, something - to demonstrate that he or she has done some deep and sustained thinking about American history and out constitution, and has come up with basically right answers.
Harriet worked on the Texas lottary commission, and she contributed to Meal-on-Wheels.
I know, slimey, isn't it?