[Do not dub me shapka broham]

He has resentments, and by any objective criteria he's entitled to them.

However, that does not diminish his perfectly legitimate criticism of Miers one jot, or make his strong reservations any less valid.

This nomination is a loser, and even the most ardent advocates of it realize that at some subconscious level.

[Dane]

However, that does not diminish his perfectly legitimate criticism of Miers one jot, or make his strong reservations any less valid.

This nomination is a loser, and even the most ardent advocates of it realize that at some subconscious level

And please tell me how a person who is pro-RTKBA(Ms. Meirs) is such a loser, while someone who is basically anti-RTKBA(Robert Bork) is such a winner, oh yeah and why doesn't Mark Levin bear any responsiblity for his vetting of Justice kennedy, who is basically the lawrence tribe(i.e Harvard liberal) mouthpiece on SCOTUS.

[Michael.SF.]

He has resentments, and by any objective criteria he's entitled to them. Agreed

However, that does not diminish his perfectly legitimate criticism of Miers one jot, or make his strong reservations any less valid. Probably, but I would say that his opinion is tainted some what.

This nomination is a loser, She will be confirmed, so the nomination is not a "loser", by that criteria.

and even the most ardent advocates of it realize that at some subconscious level. High disappointment is how I feel about this selection. However, I do believe that she will serve 'adequately', provide a solid conservative vote for 15-20 yrs. and will not live up to the rhetoric we are hearing against her today.