Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Loooong article, but chock full of interesting stuff.

I find Rove later remembering about the Cooper meeting as an oversight that he corrected...this article makes it sound like a criminal act.

1 posted on 10/07/2005 3:27:55 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: frankjr

...this article makes it sound like a criminal act.
-----
Welcome to the ugly, leftist media, the news outlet for the DARK SIDE OF THE FORCE...always negative, always trying to make Repubs look exactly like what they are...crooked, liars, criminals, slimey, the list goes on.


2 posted on 10/07/2005 3:39:25 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

It's not even clear any crime was committed. And I really don't think Rove's failure to recall a conversation rises to the level of concealment of evidence or lying to federal prosecuters or whatever the heck they're talking about.


3 posted on 10/07/2005 3:40:50 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Weren't we informed early on that Plame had not been an undercover agent for 5 or 6 years before her name became known and that was long enough that it was no longer a crime to out her?
6 posted on 10/07/2005 4:09:19 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Rove: "I am not a crook"


7 posted on 10/07/2005 4:11:05 PM PDT by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper

ping


9 posted on 10/07/2005 4:22:09 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove personally assured President Bush in the early fall of 2003 that he had not disclosed to anyone in the press that Valerie Plame....

Well, it would have been pretty damned stupid of Rove to tell Bush anything if he had been involved because short of immediately reporting Rove to the authorities, Bush could have been implicated in a conspiracy.

This is not the type of situation where executive privilege or right to legal counsel could be claimed, so if Rove had been naughty, naughty (and I'm not saying he had), then the right thing to do was lie to Bush.

12 posted on 10/07/2005 5:23:47 PM PDT by mumps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson