Skip to comments.
Miller Surrenders Additional Notes
NY Observer ^
| 10/07/05
| Gabriel Sherman
Posted on 10/07/2005 1:58:06 PM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
"But a lawyer close to the investigation said that the new set of notes details earlier contact Miller had with Libby--possibly in May 2003, two months before Wilson's op-ed appeared."
curious.
1
posted on
10/07/2005 1:58:08 PM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
Miller had better get used to prison garments; looks like she's headed for an extended stay :o)
2
posted on
10/07/2005 2:02:06 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: Pikamax
3
posted on
10/07/2005 2:02:08 PM PDT
by
samadams2000
(Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
To: Pikamax
Uncle Bob could get Bubba off the hook because BC never took any stinking notes. And never required FOBs to sign in for visits.
4
posted on
10/07/2005 2:03:08 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Bush to Blanco to "tighten up", so she called her plastic surgeon)
To: samadams2000
5
posted on
10/07/2005 2:03:28 PM PDT
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: Pikamax
Now, we have a high-profile Times reporterette doing a Nixonian "modified limited hang-out".
To: Pikamax
After spending 85 days in jail for civil contempt, Miller testified before Fitzgerald's grand jury on September 30 and turned over one set of edited notes.Edited notes? How can she get by with that? What are the new notes? Edited or fabricated?
Maybe he should ask Miller if she has any notes of her conversations with Dan Rather? < /sarcasm>
To: ravingnutter
What are the new notes? Edited or fabricated? depends (as in diapers - full of crap)
To: Pikamax
So what....appears all these so called reporters are a big old bunch of liars. Miller is most probably the LEAKER...if there's actually a leaker in the crowd. Plume was NOT an operative in the first place. So where's the crime...in the coverup by these so called reporters. LOL
9
posted on
10/07/2005 2:08:28 PM PDT
by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: Pikamax
Can someone splain what this means?
10
posted on
10/07/2005 2:09:31 PM PDT
by
Huck
("I'm calling a moratorium on Miers/Bush/GOP bashing--but it won't be easy (thanks tex))
To: eureka!
He's going down...source said it early...then Ive watched the way he discusses the matter..visibly scared...just a hunch. 8 to 1 odds.
11
posted on
10/07/2005 2:09:51 PM PDT
by
samadams2000
(Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
To: ravingnutter
Edited notes? How can she get by with that? What are the new notes? Edited or fabricated? If you listened to the headlines when Miller was released from jail, you'd think that Scooter was the one witholding his permission for Miller to testify. But if you listened further, she and her lawyer also spoke about finally coming to an agreement about "limiting" her scope of questioning before the Grand Jury.
She was in jail until she got that concession, not for any other reason.
12
posted on
10/07/2005 2:11:14 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
To: samadams2000
Victoria Toensig, who actually wrote the law protecting CIA agents, says no crime has been committed that she can see as the operative had to be undercover and Plame was not.
To: eureka!
Russert tried do an end around Fitz to get out of appearing before the GJ...but was forced to appear.
I have a hunch it's Russert and Wilson and Walter Pincus who should be worried today.
14
posted on
10/07/2005 2:14:31 PM PDT
by
Dog
( Harriet Miers ......"She's the president's nominee," he said. "She's not MINE.")
To: Pikamax
Bill Keller said Millers potential return trip to meet with Fitzgerald could further delay the Times' plans to publish an account of the Miller saga.and could require some serious editing thereof. heheheheh
15
posted on
10/07/2005 2:16:00 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Member of the Water Bucket Brigade)
To: HelloooClareece
I know this much: I trust Scooter Libby a lot more than any NYT reporter.
16
posted on
10/07/2005 2:16:15 PM PDT
by
mwl1
To: Dog
17
posted on
10/07/2005 2:17:21 PM PDT
by
mwl1
To: Dog
I have a hunch it's Russert and Wilson and Walter Pincus who should be worried today.That is just music to my ears.
18
posted on
10/07/2005 2:18:20 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Member of the Water Bucket Brigade)
To: HelloooClareece
Oh I agree no one initially broke the law in the administration. I'm thinking media cabal goes down.
R-U-S-S-E-R-T
19
posted on
10/07/2005 2:19:52 PM PDT
by
samadams2000
(Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
To: Bahbah
Let me understand: Wilson and his media handmaidens "outed" his own wife so as to blame the Bush Administration?
Would they really be that reckless?
20
posted on
10/07/2005 2:20:04 PM PDT
by
mwl1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson