Evolution and intelligent design Life is a cup of tea

Economist ^ | 10/6/05 | Economist

[Gumlegs]

A couple have been tossed for himesy, which is worse because of its masculinist tendencies.

[Thatcherite]

He seems to enjoy sending me mail. Now I've had this one...

You act just like one of those "feminized androgenous automatons" I spoke of. Anti-Christian sentiment from a euro-weenie like you is not surprising. The entire continent is a postmoder post-Christian society that has totally abandoned its reformation roots. Europeans will be extinct as soon as the islamists gain enough population. I just hope you are still alive to be forced to face Mecca 5 times/day.

Have a nice day.

It is always refreshing to engage in reasoned debate.

[Doctor Stochastic]

I had this image of a snake eating it's tail...

Kekulé turned such an image into insight into the structure of benzene. (At least, so he claimed years later.)

[Stultis]

Boy, he's started early. I think I'll have a drink too.

[Doctor Stochastic]

However playing a strumpet playing a nun (not playing a trumpet), she did well.

[Thatcherite]

No, you. So, you deign to talk to a non-"blackguard", Mr. I'm-so-special? ;>

I get it now. Slow, wasn't I. I guess I'm just not cut out for the kind of vanity involved in being a real blackguard.

[Thatcherite]

New tagline placemarker.

[Dimensio]

I understand. No one wants a flawed hero.

No one claims that Darwin is perfect, but creationists have a history of using unfounded lies to attack the man rather than addressing the merits of the theory. Of course, rather than attempt to support the claims made about Darwin, you stand on the sidelines and cheer on another creationist who dishonestly refused to support his false claims.

[js1138]

interesting thread over here, in a sick sort of way.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1498912/posts

[ml1954]

In the Dover case, intelligent design appears to have found unusually clueless champions.

'unusually clueless champions'... Love that Brit sense of humor.

[eleni121]

Except evolutionists look at the sky and wonder for all the wrong reasons.

[Mr. Quarterpanel]

All of which looked good in the beginning, and had popular support and lots of practitioners, but then failed to live up to close scrutiny.

ID will suffer the same fate. It will eventually collapse under its own weight.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Except evolutionists look at the sky and wonder for all the wrong reasons."

So YOU say. :)

[Stultis]

Of course, rather than attempt to support the claims made about Darwin, you stand on the sidelines and cheer on another creationist who dishonestly refused to support his false claims.

It's not only b.s., its hypocrisy. If Darwin was a "racist" then so was Abraham Lincoln. In fact you could come up with stronger "evidence" re Lincoln. But the cretoids who regularly claim Darwin was racist would label the same charges against Lincoln (and in most cases correctly) as leftist historical revisionism.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"My position on slavery? I don't consider it is wrong to have slaves."

Speachless here.

(not shocked though)

[taxesareforever]

So where did Paul go wrong? His God lives. The god of Mithraism is dead. Believe in the one you want.

[taxesareforever]

Wow. I'll certainly remember not to go to you for interpretation of Scripture.

[taxesareforever]

You do have a point.

[Dimensio]

It's not only b.s., its hypocrisy. If Darwin was a "racist" then so was Abraham Lincoln. In fact you could come up with stronger "evidence" re Lincoln.

On a related note, not to long ago I saw someone on FR attempt to "prove" that Darwin was a racist by bringing up a very clearly segregationist quote. Except that the quote wasn't from Darwin at all, it was from Abraham Lincoln.