[Stultis]

Of course, rather than attempt to support the claims made about Darwin, you stand on the sidelines and cheer on another creationist who dishonestly refused to support his false claims.

It's not only b.s., its hypocrisy. If Darwin was a "racist" then so was Abraham Lincoln. In fact you could come up with stronger "evidence" re Lincoln. But the cretoids who regularly claim Darwin was racist would label the same charges against Lincoln (and in most cases correctly) as leftist historical revisionism.

[Dimensio]

It's not only b.s., its hypocrisy. If Darwin was a "racist" then so was Abraham Lincoln. In fact you could come up with stronger "evidence" re Lincoln.

On a related note, not to long ago I saw someone on FR attempt to "prove" that Darwin was a racist by bringing up a very clearly segregationist quote. Except that the quote wasn't from Darwin at all, it was from Abraham Lincoln.