Dumbest analysis I've seen yet.
Thereby proving the writer's thesis.
It's amazing how someone can be so wrong on legal, ethical, theological and practical issues, all in one article!
Wonder of he knows about "The Legal Duck?"
It's a good thing scientists don't think they can practice law the way some lawyers think they can practice science.
His #3 is particularly egregious.
One reason Islamic countries are such backwaters today is that they let religion trump science and clear thinking.
It's pretty dumb, but not the dumbest I've seen. When will this terribly narrow vision stop getting attention.
You certainly make a convincing argument. Did you learn your method of reasoning in science class?
This article is truly hard to refute, except by saying "it's dumb" ...
ID will win out for the very reasons that he states, just as Relativity won out over Newtonian physics. Most of the time Newtonian mechanics works just fine, but it is in the breach that it is proven insufficient.