Skip to comments.
Student Leader: Hinrichs Not Muslim
Channel 5 Oklahoma ^
| Thu Oct 6,12:52 PM ET
Posted on 10/06/2005 5:57:49 PM PDT by ovrtaxt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 last
To: ovrtaxt
![](http://media.oudaily.com/vimages/shared/vnews/stories/s-4341fe8b294e8-14-1.jpg)
Another filthy little jihadi eats the dust IMHO.
61
posted on
10/06/2005 9:29:28 PM PDT
by
Fred Nerks
(Understand islam understand evil - read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf see link My Page)
To: ovrtaxt
Maybe I'm just cynical, but expecting Muslims to admit that a terrorist is a Muslim is absurd. Hell, most of them think 9/11 was committed by the Jews or Bush. But then they praise bin Laden for "humbling" the Great Satan.
And let us not forget that Islam allows and encourages Muslims to lie to the infidel.
62
posted on
10/06/2005 11:47:02 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: Redcloak
You're referring to the Muslim doctrine of Taqiyya which holds that lying in defense of Islam is permissible.
Very few non-Muslims understand this doctrine of Islam. Taqiyya roughly translates to "lying for the faith." In it, a Muslim can lie as a holy duty to deceive and gain an advantage over the infidel.
63
posted on
10/06/2005 11:54:18 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: texianyankee
I mean, letting a terrorist you don't know but happen to be sitting next to on a bus use your laptop, your email addy, and your password - it could happen to anyone. Probably a couple of us reading this thread, it's happened to!
64
posted on
10/07/2005 12:29:35 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: ovrtaxt
65
posted on
10/07/2005 7:12:53 AM PDT
by
Houmatt
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Prime Choice
[T]he Muslim doctrine of Taqiyya, holds that lying in defense of Islam is permissible... In it, a Muslim can lie as a holy duty to deceive and gain an advantage over the infidel.So if we were to accuse Ashraf Hussein of lying about Hinrichs, that would actually be seen as a compliment, would it not.
66
posted on
10/07/2005 9:24:26 AM PDT
by
Redcloak
(We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singin' "whiskey for my men and beer for my horses!")
To: Redcloak
So if we were to accuse Ashraf Hussein of lying about Hinrichs, that would actually be seen as a compliment, would it not. In the anti-American Leftist circles that deem good to be "evil" and evil to be "good," I suppose so.
67
posted on
10/07/2005 9:57:27 AM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson