Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How can George Will now stand against Miers? Miers was picked because the RINOS would never trigger the nuclear option and clear the way for a great nominee like Luttig. Now Will wants it both ways.

See the other thread on Mark Levin's article.

1 posted on 10/06/2005 2:30:40 PM PDT by Mighty_Quinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mighty_Quinn
I knew there was a reason that I always thought Will was a weasel.
2 posted on 10/06/2005 2:34:45 PM PDT by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn

"How can George Will now stand against Miers?"

Because he wants a well-qualified conservative nominee for the Supreme Court???


3 posted on 10/06/2005 2:36:16 PM PDT by Betaille ("And if the stars burn out there's only fire to blame" -Duran Duran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn
If GWB had nominated someone for SCOTUS who was actually filibustered, then you'd have a case, maybe. But as it is, it's a total non-issue. There was no filibuster, so there's no need for a nuke option.
4 posted on 10/06/2005 2:37:54 PM PDT by Huck ("Sometimes you're better off not knowing how much you've been had." --Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn


Good catch.


5 posted on 10/06/2005 2:38:52 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn

This is a good catch to remind people that even Will can be inconsistent--and to remind them of his ongoing feud with the Bush family.

Nothing they do can be right in old George's intellectual world.


6 posted on 10/06/2005 2:45:52 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn

George Will lost his base a long time ago.


7 posted on 10/06/2005 2:46:27 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn; Huck
Rush Limbaugh mentioned this on his radio show today. Whoever tracked this down did a very good job.

A few months ago George Will was making the case that eliminating these judicial filibusters was a bad idea. Then yesterday he criticized the Bush administration for failing to nominate a "truly conservative" Supreme Court justice who only could have been confirmed if the GOP exercised the "nuclear option" and overturned the filibuster rule.

In taking these schizophrenic positions on the issue of judicial nominations, Mr. Will has exposed himself as an utter, two-faced fraud. The man is so full of sh!t that I can smell him from here.

He writes very well and often makes good points, but never trust an inside-the-Beltway jack@ss who wears a bowtie and lists "professional pundit" as his occupation.

25 posted on 10/06/2005 5:03:20 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn

Interesting catch.


28 posted on 10/06/2005 5:11:39 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn

Some might say that here is all the proof we need that tying your bow-tie too tight will kill your brain cells.

Others (more cynical) would observe that Mr. Will's lush income depends upon his finding some "conflict", somewhere, to pontificate about...


32 posted on 10/06/2005 6:03:31 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mighty_Quinn

Thank you for finding this.


36 posted on 10/06/2005 6:10:48 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson