Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rove Said to Testify in CIA Leak Case
AP ^ | October 6, 2005 | JOHN SOLOMON

Posted on 10/06/2005 12:19:41 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

Federal prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove to give 11th-hour testimony in the case of a CIA officer's leaked identity but have warned they cannot guarantee he won't be indicted, according to people directly familiar with the investigation.

The persons, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, said Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has not made any decision yet on whether to file criminal charges against the longtime confidant of President Bush or others.

The U.S. attorney's manual requires prosecutors not to bring witnesses before a grand jury if there is a possibility of future criminal charges unless they are notified in advance that their grand jury testimony can be used against them in a later indictment.

Rove has already made at least three grand jury appearances and his return at this late stage in the investigation is unusual.

The prosecutor did not give Rove similar warnings before his earlier grand jury appearances.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; cialeak; plame; rove; skyisfalling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301 next last
To: Carolinamom

Problem is prosecutors are in the business of finding someone to blame for everything. He was appointed for a reason, so he assumes a crime must be there; otherwise why ask for him to look into it. It's just human nature. Plus it's tempered by the fact...if he's wrong the jury will acquit. I'm sure that info will be brought up at trial (if it goes to trial..usually these guys get a plea bargain like Sandy Burglar).

Rove will face prison time if he loses or admit to guilt and get probation. Either way his political career is over. The damage is done. Remember this isn't a local state prosecutor like the Delay case. If an indictment comes out against anyone it will hurt.


41 posted on 10/06/2005 12:48:45 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

O'Donnell predicted that a couple of people would be indicted in this case.
I can't stand O'Donnell, but he was the first person to identify Rove as a source for Cooper, from Time magazine.


42 posted on 10/06/2005 12:48:45 PM PDT by ruschpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan
"Let him testify, not me. What was I thinking?"

LOL
I just re-read your posting and it was hilarious as written.

43 posted on 10/06/2005 12:48:59 PM PDT by Edmund Dante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
I have nothing by rumor to go on, but from the expressions on people's faces around these parts...they're really worried.

Damn, I'm getting a headache--big time.
44 posted on 10/06/2005 12:49:53 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Rove is being called back because Miller's testimony is discrepant with something said about Rove.

So either she's lying or someone else is (maybe Rove), and Fitzgerald wants to get to the bottom of it.

45 posted on 10/06/2005 12:50:12 PM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Hard to prove, but quite easy to charge someone with it.


46 posted on 10/06/2005 12:51:19 PM PDT by Mr. XYZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

If that is the case, I'm betting Rove has notes and Miller doesn't.


47 posted on 10/06/2005 12:51:37 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Bush to Blanco to "tighten up", so she called her plastic surgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Even if he gets indicted, all Rove needs to do is to run out the clock until one day after the '08 election. Then its pardon time. If McCain is the GOP candidate, Bush might not even wait that long. It will be two-for: a going away gift for a loyal soldier and a kidney punch to a disloyal one.


48 posted on 10/06/2005 12:52:40 PM PDT by Airborne1986 (Well, you can do what you want to us. But we're not going to sit here while you badmouth the U.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
The very first line in the article: Federal prosecutors have accepted an offer from presidential adviser Karl Rove to give 11th-hour testimony

Prosecutors aren't calling him...he's going because he wants to correct a statement he's made.

49 posted on 10/06/2005 12:52:41 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa

O'Donnell also wrote today that Rove received a target letter because Rove's lawyer failed to deny receiving one. He just did so today (that is, Rove's lawyer denied receiving a target letter). So O'Donnell has no more inside info than we do. He's just speculating. People who speculate are sometimes right, and they're sometimes wrong.


50 posted on 10/06/2005 12:53:20 PM PDT by Mr. XYZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mr. XYZ

Nothing that happens in this Grand Jury is confidential or secret, even if it should be.


51 posted on 10/06/2005 12:53:41 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan

Karl, is that you? LOL!


52 posted on 10/06/2005 12:53:52 PM PDT by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

It does sort of sound like a good hook. If I write the song, I will send you the first copy and give you writers credit. Fair enough?


53 posted on 10/06/2005 12:54:59 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. XYZ

Let's start thinking it's a worse case scenario. Because it's starting to look that way. I can tell from the article above that he's now a target.

Republican's should have played like clinton and attacked the special prosecutor [/just kidding].


54 posted on 10/06/2005 12:55:16 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mr. XYZ

Let's start thinking it's a worse case scenario. Because it's starting to look that way. I can tell from the article above that he's now a target.

Republican's should have played like clinton and attacked the special prosecutor [/just kidding].


55 posted on 10/06/2005 12:55:46 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: All

Could this be the reason why W picked Miers just in case Rove or anyone else is indicted? That way there would not be two major political battles this large going on at the same time? No tin foil, just a thought.


56 posted on 10/06/2005 12:55:53 PM PDT by CELTICGAEL (Celt) (RINO taft resign now! Blackwell for Gov!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I have a question - is the prosecutor a Democrat? Ever since Miller got out of jail and Fitzgerald (Fitzpatrick, whatever his name is) made a deal with her not to ask about her other sources (supposedly) I'm beginning to wonder if this is going to end up with an indictment of Rove. Yeah, yeah, I have my tinfoil hat on and maybe you need one to read this, but I started wondering at that point when nothing made any sense about why she would sit there for 3 months and suddenly just before his grand jury ran out, she would decide to testify. What if this is just another indictment like Delay's to get rid of Rove for the '06 election. The Dimwits are terrified of Rove. Most of this "corruption" crap is beginning to look like a playbook for the '06 election including the Dimbulbs having a Contract on American starting with HillaryCare. Looks like they are just borrowing Newt's from '94 and creating things to fill in the blanks.


57 posted on 10/06/2005 12:56:12 PM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

It looked like Wolf was going to pee his pants with joy.


58 posted on 10/06/2005 12:56:26 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

The article says he did NOT receive a target letter.


59 posted on 10/06/2005 12:56:31 PM PDT by Mr. XYZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Hard to prove, but you don't have to prove anything to bring an indictment. The only thing he's really got going for him is that the case is in NY. Better there than DC, though not much.


60 posted on 10/06/2005 12:58:00 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson