Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: syriacus
An attorney (or a judge) that can't make a decision is worthless. I deal with judges that can't make a decision on a daily basis...and know what they always do?

They take the middle road, which is invariably whatever some other court has held (or, I should say, what I tell them that court has held...LOL)...completely unable to think for themselves.

I guarantee you that Scalia knows how he is going to rule on a case once he reads the issue presented. Miers, OTOH, looks like another swing vote.

53 posted on 10/06/2005 7:19:43 AM PDT by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: ContemptofCourt
I guarantee you that Scalia knows how he is going to rule on a case once he reads the issue presented.

Yes...Scalia is talented in his own way.

Yet, there is much to recommend in people who don't make snap decisions.

More deliberative decision makers are often much more skilled at convincing others to see things their way.

People who make quick decisions, even if they make the right decisions, can be terrible at explaining things to others .

59 posted on 10/06/2005 7:38:08 AM PDT by syriacus (Estrada deserved a hearing and an up/down vote. Miers deserves a hearing and an up/down vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson