Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dawn53
When the "snobbery" issue first came up, I didn't give it much credence, but after Will's article yesterday, and here again this "in Washington" statement, it's beginning to make me wonder if elitism has taken hold of conservatives.

I had flagged the same phrase you did: in Washington. It literally jumped out at me. I think we're finally unraveling the mystery of the seemingly inexplicable opposition to this nomination. They don't think Miers is worthy to join the club.

She doesn't have the "right" credentials, she doesn't know the right people, she didn't spend her life enmeshed in theoretical legal scholarship. She didn't play by the elite legal establishment rules and now it's not "fair" that she's allowed in!

120 posted on 10/06/2005 1:45:23 PM PDT by LikeLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: LikeLight

All the issues you mention are trifles. The issue is Miers, not Frum. If she supports racial preferences, (nobody has refuted this charge) she is unfit for the SC, an certainly unfit to be called a conservative. PERIOD.


123 posted on 10/06/2005 1:59:47 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: LikeLight

she doesn't have the "right" credentials, she doesn't know the right people, she didn't spend her life enmeshed in theoretical legal scholarship. She didn't play by the elite legal establishment rules and now it's not "fair" that she's allowed in!

Take out :"Miers name" and "legal" and insert President Bush and President.

I am disgusted with this criticism. This President does not deserve this from his own party.


140 posted on 10/06/2005 5:30:08 PM PDT by pugmama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson