Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frank T
But rather, where's the proof that she's not going to be a judicial activist?

She has stated she believes in a literal interpretation of the Constution.

Any sitting appeals court judge who had demonstrated such with votes would get filibustered by the Dems - while the RINOs in the Gang of 14 would not help invoke the nuclear option.

I'd love to seek JRB nominated and confirmed myself. But she'd never get through.

As long as we have 7 RINOs in the GOP Senate majority, them's the rules.

65 posted on 10/06/2005 5:17:50 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

"She has stated she believes in a literal interpretation of the Constution."

Then why is Harry Reid a supporter?


70 posted on 10/06/2005 6:06:08 AM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson