"I think it is more a case of comprehension and not manipulation. Quite obviously you disagree with my opinion, but rather than address it substantively, you chose to take this direction."
That's the Mary Mapes school of thought for you. Don't question that it was a fake, but only what you are spinning.
[[That's the Mary Mapes school of thought for you. Don't question that it was a fake, but only what you are spinning.]]
Ad hominem from you, Frank ? I am shocked !! NOT !! Diversion is the typical response when one cannot provide substantive rebuttal. Your rebuttal can be summed up in one sentence: "He is trying to fake me out and manipulate me", while you clearly avoid the numerous observations made.
I wrote it, so it is obviously not fake. Comprehension 101 classes start in January.