I'm skeptical. My undestanding is that the prosecuter gave Miller a pass - no questions about other sources of the leak, no questions re Wilson bragging all over the DC cocktail circuit that his wife was CIA.
As if the Prosecuters needed Millers testimony.
1.) Plame was outed by a traitor and not undercover.
2.) The only person to speak of her employment publicly was her husband.
3.) If the traitor was not considered as outing her since it was not "public" knowledge, then people not knowing could not have public knowledge.
4.) Which leads back to her husband as the only person who mentioned her occupation with any authority on the matter.
Conclusion: the quackers are the ducks and they are the Wilsons/Plames.
I think you guys just got famous ;-)
http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2005_10_02_patriotboy_archive.html#112860469462214576
Why would you be skeptical? Miller, in her own article, wrote that she testified that Libby was not her source for the leak of the name, that she thought the name came from another source.