Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Read the WHOLE article before you comment lest you risk making a damnfool out of yourself!
1 posted on 10/05/2005 8:58:10 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc

Making an example that the argument raised by this nomination is not primarily on constitutional principle.


2 posted on 10/05/2005 9:01:29 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
To whatever extent he intended it as a stealth enterprise, he has followed with Harriet Miers. Here's to movement conservatives not joining with the left to blow her cover. And if Bush is not the dim bulb those who detest him insist he is, then the rest of us might be well advised, through faith and intellect, to believe in his nominee.

A-freekin-men!!

3 posted on 10/05/2005 9:06:54 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc


She does have certain credentials but there is not one reasonable person who can claim she is the "Best Choice."


4 posted on 10/05/2005 9:09:31 PM PDT by msnimje (Hurricane KATRINA - An Example of Nature's Enforcement of Eminent Domain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

I think W felt he had to take this route. If the libs threaten a filabuster against one of the "gifted" candidates, the coward repubs will cave. He could not count on 50 Senators to vote the nuclear option, nor count on them to back him when the going really gets hot. Look how they backed Lott. Look how they back anyone or thing when things get hot. Miers may be the best choice despite the lack of glitz the elitist want. She is already better than Souter, Breyer, Ginsberg, Stevens, Kennedy, and O'Conner!!!! It is scary to fight all these years to retake this hill and note your troops are all worried about their re-elections, presidential hopes, or public portrayal by the liberal media. Bush may have just won the battle up front


9 posted on 10/05/2005 9:18:17 PM PDT by right right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

I'll await the hearings to judge her, but I'm not crazy about the fact that the president didn't go with someone at least a decade younger.


15 posted on 10/05/2005 9:31:56 PM PDT by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Warren, Suoter, Miers?


17 posted on 10/05/2005 9:43:49 PM PDT by Patti_ORiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
All of the arguments against Miers rest on the assumption that the President is either a fool or a coward or a traitor or dishonest or all four. I'm laughing my ASS off at all of the useful idiots who are totally misunderestimating the President, the nominee and especially the strategery.

Please, please Bush-bashers, PLEASE keep attacking him and the nominee! It will reduce the criticism from the Left while, in the end, mattering not at all among Senate Republicans. Then, once she's on SCOTUS -- SHOCK AND AWE, BABY!!

22 posted on 10/05/2005 9:57:54 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (They misunderestimated Roberts; now they are misunderestimating Miers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson