She does have certain credentials but there is not one reasonable person who can claim she is the "Best Choice."
What difference does it make if she's never been married?
Go back to DU! Bush said she's the best choice, you liberal troll!
That's a lie. It is quite reasonable to claim she is the best choice. It's simply a matter of defining what best means in this instance. I assume that you believe it means having a certain public track record or a proven intellect or an educational background.
That is simply an unreasonable and faulty way of defining best. Best in my mind involves the President's perspective of having confidence in her judicial philosophy now and in 20 years, her perceived ability to play a role in helping bring some moderate Supremes rightward, and her viability in making it through the Senate. On these three items I believe she is the best.
There is not one person who knows who is the best choice. The fact that she is the President's choice seems to comport with the law of the land. He has won the presidency, twice.
Yes, there is one, George W. Bush. He might be wrong, he might not. But he, knowing her as well as he does, can credibly claim she is the best choice. And he might be right.
I'll claim that. She's not been a judge and has been "down among the common folk". She hasn't lost touch with real people as most judges do. Lawyers deal with real people. If she's confirmed, I hope she stays clear of the elitist attitude of judges.
She's the bestest choice 'cuz she's such a swell pal.
She's so lightweight she has to carry a load of buckshot in each cheek just to keep from floating away.
Who's her lawyer? Her own lawyer likely has more heft than she does.
There is not one reasonable person who can claim she is not.
You cannot in the same breath complain that nothing is known about her and that she is not qualified, which is what most of the emotionally-driven complaints about her have been.