[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

I do not care if she is a committed Christian or not. I don't care about where she goes to church. It should neither qualify or disqualify her. I care about her judicial experience and philosophy. I don't like it.

[LiteKeeper]

Remember, Rhenquist had no judical experience before his appointment

[CheyennePress]

What don't you like about her judicial philosophy?

[Nathan Zachary]

I don't like this crap either. So what if she goes to church, twice on Sundays if she wants!! It would be a violation of her constitutional rights if the Senate refuses to nominate her based on her freedom to practice her religion. Now, because they are making a big deal of it, anyone who votes against her will have a hard time trying to convince anyone it wasn't because of her religious affiliation. They should be removed from the senate floor, fired because of their religious bigotry. It is unaceptable in this country.

[AmericaUnited]

I do not care if she is a committed Christian or not. I don't care about where she goes to church. It should neither qualify or disqualify her. I care about her judicial experience and philosophy. I don't like it.

And why don't you 'like it', besides just wanting to go into a 'snit' or temper tantrum, like so many others around here?

I do not care if she is a committed Christian or not.

I would not have you nominate a person for dog-catcher. I don't want some intellectual idiot, guided by ZERO on the inside, deciding great moral issues, that I and the rest of society have to live under. I, like the Founding Fathers, know the most important attribute for a position like this IS their character, and that is derived from their beliefs.