Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Supports Interrogation Limits (90-9 vote to protect terrorist detainees)
Washington Post ^ | Oct. 6, 2005 | Charles Babington and Shailagh Murray

Posted on 10/05/2005 8:08:18 PM PDT by FairOpinion

The Senate defied the White House yesterday and voted to set new limits on interrogating detainees in Iraq and elsewhere, underscoring Congress's growing concerns about reports of abuse of suspected terrorists and others in military custody.

Forty-six Republicans joined 43 Democrats and one independent in voting to define and limit interrogation techniques that U.S. troops may use against terrorism suspects, the latest sign that alarm over treatment of prisoners in the Middle East and at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is widespread in both parties. The White House had fought to prevent the restrictions, with Vice President Cheney visiting key Republicans in July and a spokesman yesterday repeating President Bush's threat to veto the larger bill that the language is now attached to -- a $440 billion military spending measure.

But last night, 89 senators sided with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a former prisoner of war in Vietnam who led the fight for the interrogation restrictions.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; d; gwot; interrogation; iraq; mccain; senate; spinelessrino; terror; terrorism; terrorists; un; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-426 next last
I hope Bush vetoes the entire bill and I would love to start a recall of EVERY Senator who voted for it.
1 posted on 10/05/2005 8:08:19 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Band of sissies realizes elections are around the corner. What a pack of spineless turds.


2 posted on 10/05/2005 8:10:01 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Free choice is not what it seems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

snip:

In its statement on the veto threat, the White House said the measure would "restrict the president's authority to protect Americans effectively from terrorist attack and bringing terrorists to justice."

snip

Terrorists are rejoicing, that the US CONGRESS is going out of their way to protect the terrorists, instead of the American people.


3 posted on 10/05/2005 8:10:44 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I don't think Bush is aware he even has Veto power.


4 posted on 10/05/2005 8:11:18 PM PDT by Sometimes A River (If you don't agree with Bush and the GOP Congress 100%, go back to DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Unless this is vetoed, we have just lost the war.


5 posted on 10/05/2005 8:11:41 PM PDT by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Figures McLame is the one behind this.
6 posted on 10/05/2005 8:11:47 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9
And Powell is enthusiastically supporting them. I am glad he is no longer in the administration.

Jabbing at the administration in which he served, retired four-star general and former Secretary of State Colin Powell backed McCain's amendment, which he said in a letter would "help deal with the terrible public diplomacy crisis created by Abu Ghraib."

7 posted on 10/05/2005 8:12:27 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9
Band of sissies realizes elections are around the corner. What a pack of spineless turds.

And so the MSM vultures wins a major victory for the terrorists and the ACLU.

8 posted on 10/05/2005 8:14:36 PM PDT by prophetic ("I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things."--Dan Rather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Here is a link where you can read the article without registering:

Senate Approves Detainee Treatment Rules

http://www.edmondsun.com/articles/2005/10/04/ap/headlines/d8d2807g2.txt


9 posted on 10/05/2005 8:14:59 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

"Unless this is vetoed, we have just lost the war."


===

Dramatic as your statement is, I am afraid you are exactly right.


10 posted on 10/05/2005 8:18:02 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
This is worse than it looks. Over the last year, the MSM hypes "abuses" at Gitmo for political purposes. Then the people start believing it, polling shows people 'concerned about abuses at Guantanamo', and our elected officials all try to get out in front of it.

Laugh if you want to, but this vote was brought to us courtesy of the New York Times, et al.

11 posted on 10/05/2005 8:18:49 PM PDT by Starve The Beast (I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

My question is, will they accept responsibility, if we have another attack, which may have been prevented by interrogating some terrorists we captured?

Remember, if the FBI had been able to look at Moussaui's computer, they may have discovered and foiled the 9-11 attack.

Now Congress wants to shackle intelligence gathering again, even after seeing what happened on 9-11.


12 posted on 10/05/2005 8:20:10 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Don't get me started...


13 posted on 10/05/2005 8:22:16 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Free choice is not what it seems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Mr. President:

You know how you've never used your veto pen? Here's a damn good time to try it.

Who are the 10 patriots??


14 posted on 10/05/2005 8:22:36 PM PDT by RockinRight (Why are there so many RINOs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Does anyone know who voted for and against?

I tried to find it, but I couldn't. I am sure it's there, is you know how to look


15 posted on 10/05/2005 8:24:34 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Has this made it through the House yet?


16 posted on 10/05/2005 8:24:43 PM PDT by RockinRight (Why are there so many RINOs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I hope Bush vetoes the entire bill...

What a breakthrough in genetic engineering that would be. Next thing you know they'd be regenerating spines in Congress.

17 posted on 10/05/2005 8:25:43 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
President Bush's threat to veto the larger bill that the language is now attached to -- a $440 billion military spending measure.

Maybe Bush will finally veto something???

18 posted on 10/05/2005 8:25:58 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (trust but verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

"McCain's allies included Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), a former military lawyer, and Armed Services Committee Chairman John W. Warner (R-Va.)."


19 posted on 10/05/2005 8:26:26 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

This is total crap. These worthless Senators are more worried about our enemies than they are our own troops.

What a bunch of wussies! I met several of my son's fellow Marines last weekend at a welcome home party for my son and let me tell you. Anyone of these fine young men are more valuable to our country than the entire worthless Senate put together.


20 posted on 10/05/2005 8:26:33 PM PDT by texasmountainman (proud father of a U.S. Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-426 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson