Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US officials brace for decisions in CIA leak case Wed Oct 5, 2005 9:07 PM ET
Reuters ^ | 10-5-05 | Reuters

Posted on 10/05/2005 6:57:48 PM PDT by dogbyte12

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The federal prosecutor investigating who leaked the identity of a CIA operative is expected to signal within days whether he intends to bring indictments in the case, legal sources close to the investigation said on Wednesday.

As a first step, prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was expected to notify officials by letter if they have become targets, said the lawyers, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Fitzgerald could announce plea agreements, bring indictments, or conclude that no crime was committed. By the end of this month he is expected to wrap up his nearly two-year-old investigation into who leaked CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity.

The inquiry has ensnared President George W. Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, and Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby. The White House had long maintained that Rove and Libby had nothing to do with the leak but reporters have since named them as sources.

Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, declined to say whether his client had been contacted by Fitzgerald. In the past, Luskin has said that Rove was assured that he was not a target.

Libby's lawyer was not immediately available to comment.

"It's an ongoing investigation and we're fully cooperating," said Cheney spokeswoman Lea Anne McBride.

The outcome of the investigation could shake up an administration already reeling from criticism over its response to Hurricane Katrina and the indictment of House Republican leader Tom DeLay on a conspiracy charge related to campaign financing.

New York Times reporter Judith Miller testified to the grand jury on Friday about the conversations she had with Libby.

Plame's diplomat husband, Joseph Wilson, has accused the administration of leaking her name, damaging her ability to work undercover, to get back at him for criticizing Bush's Iraq policy.

Fitzgerald's agreement to limit the scope of Miller's testimony to her conversations with Libby -- a proposal he rejected a year earlier -- suggested that Libby had become "the focus of interest," said one of the lawyers involved in the case.

After initially promising to fire anyone found to have leaked information in the case, Bush in July offered a more qualified pledge: "If someone committed a crime they will no longer work in my administration."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: cialeak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: frankjr

I pray no no one from the Bush team get indicted,but I just don't.


81 posted on 10/06/2005 12:13:19 AM PDT by patriciamary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

I pray no no one from the Bush team get indicted,but I just don't know.


82 posted on 10/06/2005 12:13:42 AM PDT by patriciamary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

Once again Bush's weakness got him into his mess. He agreed to the New York times demand and look what it got him.

I'm hearing 22 indictments. Who?


83 posted on 10/06/2005 2:35:12 AM PDT by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
I don't think any indictments will be forthcoming. There's no proof any crime was committed. The MSM beat this particular horse to death in the hopes of getting Rove. What a waste of taxpayers' dollars!

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
84 posted on 10/06/2005 2:39:54 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot from Philly

"I'm hearing 22 indictments. Who?"

The thread below discusses the 22 indictments...


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1497397/posts

In that thresd posts #29 and #31 have pics of those most likely to be indicted.


85 posted on 10/06/2005 4:26:37 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Luskin's silence worries me....he didn't hesitate in the past to say that Rove was not a target...

Me, too. This supports the rumor on K Street that Rove will be indicted.

86 posted on 10/06/2005 4:32:34 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: patriciamary
I think Libby and Rove will be indicted.

The rumor swirling in DC is that it will be Rove.

Time will tell.

87 posted on 10/06/2005 4:34:05 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

I hope not,this will really hurt Bush.Well in the hell does Bush let these investigations happen?


88 posted on 10/06/2005 2:15:53 PM PDT by patriciamary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson