Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US officials brace for decisions in CIA leak case Wed Oct 5, 2005 9:07 PM ET
Reuters ^ | 10-5-05 | Reuters

Posted on 10/05/2005 6:57:48 PM PDT by dogbyte12

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The federal prosecutor investigating who leaked the identity of a CIA operative is expected to signal within days whether he intends to bring indictments in the case, legal sources close to the investigation said on Wednesday.

As a first step, prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was expected to notify officials by letter if they have become targets, said the lawyers, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Fitzgerald could announce plea agreements, bring indictments, or conclude that no crime was committed. By the end of this month he is expected to wrap up his nearly two-year-old investigation into who leaked CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity.

The inquiry has ensnared President George W. Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, and Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby. The White House had long maintained that Rove and Libby had nothing to do with the leak but reporters have since named them as sources.

Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, declined to say whether his client had been contacted by Fitzgerald. In the past, Luskin has said that Rove was assured that he was not a target.

Libby's lawyer was not immediately available to comment.

"It's an ongoing investigation and we're fully cooperating," said Cheney spokeswoman Lea Anne McBride.

The outcome of the investigation could shake up an administration already reeling from criticism over its response to Hurricane Katrina and the indictment of House Republican leader Tom DeLay on a conspiracy charge related to campaign financing.

New York Times reporter Judith Miller testified to the grand jury on Friday about the conversations she had with Libby.

Plame's diplomat husband, Joseph Wilson, has accused the administration of leaking her name, damaging her ability to work undercover, to get back at him for criticizing Bush's Iraq policy.

Fitzgerald's agreement to limit the scope of Miller's testimony to her conversations with Libby -- a proposal he rejected a year earlier -- suggested that Libby had become "the focus of interest," said one of the lawyers involved in the case.

After initially promising to fire anyone found to have leaked information in the case, Bush in July offered a more qualified pledge: "If someone committed a crime they will no longer work in my administration."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: cialeak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
Heads up
1 posted on 10/05/2005 6:57:50 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Anybody else getting the feeling that that this really is not going to involve the true criminals in this matter, Wilson, Plame, Miller and other DNC Media? Just a feeling but.....
2 posted on 10/05/2005 7:04:16 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Please God...

Let it be Timmy Russert who is indicted.

Thank You.

3 posted on 10/05/2005 7:04:42 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

ROFL!

May I add..

Amen.


4 posted on 10/05/2005 7:08:14 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Archon of the East

YA think???


5 posted on 10/05/2005 7:10:35 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mike Pence - George Allen for POTUS!!!! ;WBB in good standing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Archon of the East
Who knows maybe this is a big rope a dope on the MSM and their Dem cohorts. Can you imagine if Wilson, Plame, Miller and other DNC Media are indicted?
6 posted on 10/05/2005 7:12:02 PM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I wish, I wish, I wish....but, alas, you know it won't happen..

I betcha Libby will be getting a hugh severance check...
7 posted on 10/05/2005 7:14:33 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mike Pence - George Allen for POTUS!!!! ;WBB in good standing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Archon of the East

indeed. not only is it directed at the wrong people to begin with, but i do not have that confident feeling in my stomach about this one.

judith miller did not just sit in jail so she could wait for the personal call from libby. she either sat there for a book deal, correct timing for the offensive on the GOP, pending a deal to not reveal the actual sources, agreement to not have to testify on her part in tipping off terrorist mosques, or some combination of the above.


8 posted on 10/05/2005 7:14:46 PM PDT by DMinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

Why would Wilson and Plame be indicted?


9 posted on 10/05/2005 7:16:01 PM PDT by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Katrina, Rita, Delay, Miers, (Rove, Lewis, Cheney?)...

Boy, Mr. President, WHO DID YOU TICK OFF?

Just a suggestion: tell Condi to shut up, because Whoever it was, it might get worse if she keeps flapping her gums.
10 posted on 10/05/2005 7:16:57 PM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archon of the East

indeed, I see little reason to have faith that Fitzgerald has the stones to take down the whole gang.


11 posted on 10/05/2005 7:18:38 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Can I add a pretty please?


12 posted on 10/05/2005 7:19:02 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

50/50 that the real story is that someone tried to frame Libby for a reporter's leak.


13 posted on 10/05/2005 7:20:42 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat ("I'm quitting the GOP! (Again!)" - Eeyore. Join the Self-Annointed Martyr Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Luskin's silence worries me....he didn't hesitate in the past to say that Rove was not a target...


14 posted on 10/05/2005 7:21:31 PM PDT by mystery-ak (Stop Freepathons...become a monthly donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

What is really funny is that the report names the people from the Administration who are 'ensnared' in the investigation. Without naming allof the media types who have had to testify, or go to jail, or who went ot jail. More of the same media BS.


15 posted on 10/05/2005 7:22:27 PM PDT by aaCharley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

and if it does happen - once again, the white house has been on defense on this from day one. do you think if Libby or Rove are indicted, that the white house is going to go on the attack like DeLay did against Earle? not a chance. what the hell was Libby and his lawyer even doing talking to Miller last week - didn't they know that this was part of the lefts plan to spin her exit from prison and GJ testimony "because my source, Libby, released me". hang up the damn phone.

I tell you, if Libby is indicted. both he and his lawyer are idiots for what they did last week to help Miller ease her way out of jail.


16 posted on 10/05/2005 7:26:11 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aaCharley

the only thing that matters are the indictments.


17 posted on 10/05/2005 7:26:55 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
Why would Wilson and Plame be indicted?

Two possible examples:

Plame gave her uncleared husband access to the secret documents that he would later claim were forged. It was found out later that there was no way he could have seen them when he said he did -- unless his wife showed them to him.

Wilson was the one who on the DC cocktail circuit regularly talked about his wife being a covert CIA agent.

18 posted on 10/05/2005 7:30:11 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

You're on to something...... I want to see Chris Matthews face when the indictments come down


19 posted on 10/05/2005 7:32:35 PM PDT by LadyBuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; cyncooper

Fyi..


20 posted on 10/05/2005 7:38:30 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson