Bush freely admits he was a party boy back in the '80s, before he turned his life around. Sometimes the truth hurts, but that's no reason to suppress it.>>>
You coulter-bots are sickening. The one and only reason she brought that up wasnt to enlighten us to a bit about Bush past we didnt know, it was so she could turn the knife she put in Bush's back a little.
Of course it wasn't! Everyone on FR already knows all about it, which is why people's "shock" rings so hollow.
...it was so she could turn the knife she put in Bush's back a little.
Her remark correctly captures the magnitude of the slap in the face it was for Bush to pass over long-suffering conservative crusaders, who do happen to be among the best legal minds of the century, so he can nominate his crony.
You coulter-bots are sickening.
A quick check will tell you that I've been consistent on the subject of this revolting nomination since before Ann's piece came out today. Are you claiming that I got my view from Ann by way of what, a fortune teller? In this case, "bots" applies better to the folks who, as Ann aptly said, would defend Bush for nominating his dog.