Yes, we are supposed to be better than DU.
DU are the type of people that accepted whatever clinton did because he had a D next to his name.
We're supposed to be better than that. We should be able to evaluate the individual merits of an action, and use our principles to decide whether it is good or bad. Not party loyatly.
That is what we should aspire to. That is what many here condemn. Failure to tow the party line gets you called a traitor or worse.
Just look at this thread for examples.
ANd that is what you have yourself partaken in. I have yet to see you reply, other than this one or to somebody whom you agree with, without an insult.
So you have gone on to insult everybody who has come upon an individual decvision to independently review and support this choice, or at least withhold judgement of her, as being Bush-bots, Kool-Aid drinkers and the like. When you yourself turn the opposite direction of what you proclaim this site is about. You refuse to partake in intelligent discussion of her, but prefer to fall upon insults and dry sarcasm and to fall upon a fervor of support of your p.o.v as pure gospel even when many points continuosly get shot down, on there merits. All because of one thing and one thing only, you guys wanted a fight. Well as a great man once said, "You wanted a fight well now you got it".