Posted on 10/05/2005 4:03:47 PM PDT by perfect stranger
I have a feeling he has no interest in doing such.
I should have said her judicial philosphy.
Great qualifications do not guarantee a conservative judge or even a good one.
Or you can just listen to her calling for GWB's impeachment with your own little ears.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1496957/posts
Nice straw man argument, but let's stay on point here....maybe YOU would like to answer the following...
....just WHY should Conservatives have to be Miss Cleo to KNOW WHAT THEY ARE GETTING for all their hard work?
"Read my lips...she's another Scalia/Thomas!"
So...Does THIS make you feel comfortable?
Now, try and answer this WITHOUT diverting attention...if you can.
You are not alone. However, just as the Robert's hearings told you nothing about how he will vote on issues you consider critical, you can expect to learn little of substance on Miers' views. If she is confirmed, you will have to wait to see how she votes.
Bush tells us she will vote the way he wants her to vote. But I don't even know how Bush would vote on most issues. For example, if he were presented with the opportunity to overrule Roe v. Wade, how would he vote? Would Roberts vote to overrule that case?
I admit I don't know. Rummy says there are things you know, things you know you don't know, and things you don't know you don't know. How do Roberts and Miers fall in terms of those categories as regards how they will vote?
Guess you don't have a clue about the mind numbing issues that can come up before the Court.
Guess any truck driver can figure out the minutia of anti trust for example.
Ann jumped the shark when she started demanding that Bush be impeached.
You know .... I have been a huge fan of Ann Coulter but she lost me with that vicious statement. That is disgusting.
I am not a "Bushbot" but I get the feeling that she has some major league bitterness going on and this statement is disgusting.
I can see why the libs (and moderates) don't like her--she has a vitriolic tongue and recently, she is marginalizing herself with every column she writes.
'Wait nevermind, I think I mioght graduate your school of thought. Ok ahemmm its 73.4% in favor or are waiting for more information against your measily 23.2 % against her."
I take it that at your school, you graduated cum laude in eloquence.
No there's not. You have to fantasize that there is so that you'll at least have somebody to fight.
Call me crazy, but I don't think that driving a stake into the heart of the conservative movement is the most auspicious manner in which to inaugurate the confirmation process for a new Supreme Court vacancy.
More hyperbole. The apocalyptic handwringing coming from you guys is hilarious.
Boo freakin' hoo. I admit that it is sad how some turn on a dime against some of our most vocal and ardent supporters of conservatism, and Ann has been a wonderful and invaluable tool to both advance conservatism and rally our spirits. But after awhile Ann has indeed crossed too many lines too often lately. If she wants to swing zingers willy nilly at other conservatives, she can't expect not to get some backfire. And in fact she is a professional and tough, she can take criticism. Weak she is not.
Let's be honest, with her nonstop biting wit, and the reality that sooner or later she will disagree with (generic) you, it is easy for most guys to understand why she still isn't married. A good wife knows how to strongly make her point and then cut it off. AC might be wise to take that into consideration.
BTW, you might consider the law of diminishing returns, as in spamming the same message over and over doesn't strengthen it, but numbs your audience, who soon tunes you out. We are well aware of where you stand now on Harriet Miers.
That's absurd. What we KNOW about her is that she is a hand-gun toting, evangelical Christian conservative who has taken adament stands against abortion whenever she was given the option.
We know she is a highly regarded lawyer with a specialty in Contract Law (and if we could somehow get the SC to recognize that the Constitution is a contract and treat it as such we will have won the constitutional debate).
People close to her say she is an originalist (similar to Bork's stance). That fits in with her Contract Law background.
We know she's put before the President every justice he's nominated (which we've liked so much).
Ann Coulter accused the President of trying hand us a Souter during the Roberts nomination. BACK THEN she wanted a sure Conservative Vote on the courts. Now it seems Roberts is the MODEL for ALL justices. I don't recall Ann apologizing or admitting she was wrong about Roberts.
Now what sort of dream candidate were YOU looking for? I can guarantee the President has already seen his/her record. He settled on THIS one. The choice is his...not yours not mine not Ann's. This wouldn't have been my choice but then I haven't seen all the documentation on MY choice either. The President has, he selected THIS one, and there is NOTHING unsuitable (that I've seen so far) about THIS one.
We WON. We got our way. I wish somehow that Conservatives would learn to be happy with victory and not see it as a plot against them.
"Its not worth the argument with you if you do not understand that you are wrong."
Would it be worth the argument if I understood I was right?
Why don't you just say goodnight?
As a matter of fact, I'm listening to the interview you're talking about as I type. She was just making a quick facetious comment. She was telling conservatives not to take their ball and go home. She said, "You can write your Congressman, you can organize local meetings, you can start your own Impeach Bush committee, whatever, just don't give in to defeatism." It's a typical one of her off-beat ironic comments.
He says those who are criticizing do not know her and haven't worked with her. Sean is trying to argue with Starr, which is humorous.
I agree with you. Which is why I want to see Opinions and/or other published works.
I want a sense of how she reasons complicated issues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.