Posted on 10/05/2005 4:03:47 PM PDT by perfect stranger
If I'm not mistaken, David Souters conservative credentials were impeccable. That did us a whole lot of good! A legal history is irrelevant when a judge makes it to the Supreme Court. History has proven that.
Also....this is how Ann gets invited onto the FOX news programs.....by being a contrarian...
SNOB!!
and yet, you saw the need to respond.
And once again, we see the great attitude of "your opinion doesn't matter, citizen! Don't you dare question the president!!!"
Not really, since there is also that eye for an eye thingy.
Either act like a christian or don't say you are one. That's the issue.
The ones I see bearing false witness are folks like Farah and Coulter.
But it's little more than a side attraction... and interesting behavior pattern to note.
What's interesting is how many whines per gallon y'all are getting on so little fuel. But I've heard those left-right hybrid positions do get outstanding mileage.
Her personal attacks on Ms. Miers and the President don't leave me very sympathetic to Ann for the personal attacks she is receiving here.
I will not attack Ann's character. I will say that this is a viscious column and is not helpful to the conservative cause nor to her own reputation.
Cheer up. She will be on O'Reilly in a minute and you can see her in all of her glory.
To what purpose then require the co-operation of the Senate? I answer, that the necessity of their concurrence would have a powerful, though, in general, a silent operation. It would be an excellent check upon a spirit of favoritism in the President, and would tend greatly to prevent the appointment of unfit characters from State prejudice, from family connection, from personal attachment, or from a view to popularity. In addition to this, it would be an efficacious source of stability in the administration.
Federalist #76
lol! I'm borrowing your tagline for use elsewhere.. Thank YOU! :)
"He has extended the conservative message in all areas. He has taken heat, and kept going. He doesn't deserve this from Coulter just because she is p*ssed. She didn't like Roberts very much either. She was wrong."
..............................
Like he has taken the conservative stand on OPEN BORDERs??
or Like stopping GOV wild spending??
Oh I know you mean like enforcing laws like in Sandy Bergers case or fully investigating ABLE DANGER.
no no no You mean getting the federal gov out of education oh i forgot he has his kennedy bill for no child yada yada
except for fighting a war that was thrust on him he has been nothing but a disappointment to any true Conservative
this was his READ MY LIPS I will appoint judges in the mold of Scalia and Thomas oh yah we just gotta
support this liberal in conservative clothes.
No. He called it to reassure his base.
And, except for some dregs here on FR, he did that.
She is likely to get the approval of every Republican Senator.
wow, that was almost clever.
It was noted because it happens here a lot. The people claiming to be the most christian engage in an awful lot of unchristian behavior.
"Not really, since there is also that eye for an eye thingy."
Yeah, justify it however you want. Rationalization is the second strongest drive in humans.
Ann made the ultimate mistake: she dared question the divinity of George Bush. For that, she is to be branded a heretic, all her good works to date notwithstanding. Then, may Heaven have mercy upon her, because the 'bots will have none.
I really like Ann but sometimes her snarkiness is poorly timed and devoid of intellect. She ends up coming off as the far right version of a moonbat.
Did you see where NRO thought Thomas was another Souter? So maybe you are right. Maybe she will be another Thomas, seeing as all these conservatives thinks she is a Souter.
Actually, he was only speeding because of subliminal guilt: His socks felt very heavy and were dragging down his right shoe. In shortform, his right foot got "possessed"... it wasn't his fault. The "supernatural" is his best defense on this one.
go suck an egg, Ann
I doubt Bush thinks we are idiots. I do think he has made an error in this nomination. He made it to appease the left. What ever his reasons ... he ain't sayin. We've called him on it. It's now time to show his cards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.