You know, given your enormous difficulties with basic reading comprehension, you have an incredibly inapt screen name...
No, "the arguments of evolution" are not "all hearsay" -- if you can actually believe that after the vast amounts of evidence which have been cited here, then you're a perfect example of the saying, "there are none so blind as he who will not see".
Furthermore, your (mis)understanding of the court exchange you quoted reveals a gross inability to grasp the material. It also reveals your complete willingness to be a shill for viciously dishonest ID-bloggers, since you are just emptily parroting their misguided attack on Forrest using that very same passage. Every try to think for yourself?
Here, learn what you utterly failed to understand on your own: The DI's Dishonest Attacks on Barbara Forrest.
I am becoming more and more utterly disgusted with the dishonest, very unChristian behavior of the creationists/IDers. The lies, unjustifiable personal attacks, and misrepresentations of facts reveal far more about you folks than you'll ever realize.
"ever" is a long time, Magister... mayyyyybe they'll be fortunate enough to get a clue before they die. aside from that, you ain't wrong.
I love it and hate it when they go after the harmless, respectable, long-dead Victorian gentleman, Charles Darwin. Beyond the illogic of attacking a scientific theory by ad hominem on the discoverer, there's a venom there which looks smaller than petty, meaner than mean. If these are really Christians, Christianity isn't what it cracks itself up to be.