Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This will be interesting...
1 posted on 10/04/2005 11:30:09 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Aussie Dasher

"chairman of the Texas Lottery from 1995-2000"

What is a good Christian women doing running the Texas Lottery? I guess her convictions may only go as deep as her bank account.

Studies show that lotteries are the favorite legal gambling game for teenagers. Statistically, one of seven who play will become addicted. But teenagers aren't the only ones affected. One out of 10 adults who gamble will become addicted too. In fact, gambling is the fastest growing addiction in America. Like alcoholism and drug addiction, compulsive gambling is costly to the economy. Families are the ones who suffer the most. Many people feel gambling is only a game that is fun, but the Bible tells us this evil is a terrible sin that will lead to poverty.

"He that hasteth to be rich hath an evil eye, and considereth not that poverty shall come upon him" (Proverbs 28:22).

Gambling in our nation is spreading as the number of states operating lotteries has more than doubled since 1980, making them the ultimate "get-rich-quick" schemes. As gambling spreads to more and more states, Christians need to have the Bible's instruction about this money robber. The Bible declares that it is wrong to bet money on the possibility of becoming instantly rich.

"He who oppresses the poor to get gain for himself, and he who gives to the rich will surely come to want" (Proverbs 22:16).

States who legalize lotteries and gambling are oppressing the poor for gain. According to a 1988 study of the Michigan lottery, that state sells the greatest number of tickets in low-income and ethnic neighborhoods in urban areas. Lottery tickets made available in grocery marts and drive-in markets make it easy for people to purchase these "chances to win the big hit." Some spend money on the lottery tickets instead of groceries for their families. Many compulsive gamblers wreck their lives and their families as they are encouraged to risk money that they usually cannot afford to lose. An estimated 15 million people are compulsive gamblers.

The lie that is used to promote this evil in our society is that legalized gambling doesn't promote crime and will lower taxes. Actually just the opposite is true -- gambling promotes other vices which attract the criminal element. This results in higher, not lower taxes as the cost for additional policing must be increased. Indian reservations and the big gambling centers of Las Vegas and Atlantic City are taking in billions of dollars. Casinos rob those who play the games with them as the odds are stacked 80% to 90% in favor of the casino. Even those that do win big on occasion statistics have proven that within two years most winners have totally spent the money they won.

Proverbs 21:20 says, "There is treasure to be desired and oil in the dwelling of the wise; but a foolish man spendeth it up."

People who gamble give to the pool of money that composes great wealth. This causes them to give to the rich and as Proverbs 22:16 says "...he who gives to the rich will surely come to want." Our states are also reaping a type of "poverty" where gambling exists because it undermines the American work ethic. The result is lowered productivity, use of work time to gamble, absenteeism, high rates of business failure, and repeated non-payment of loans, mortgages and other financial obligations. Gambling is, to many, a scheme to escape labor.

Some Christians argue that gambling does no harm. However, the scripture is clear that this activity is sinful. Anytime someone is enticed to gain money at someone's else's certain loss, this is definitely not practicing the principals taught by Christ. Also, the practice of gambling takes away from the Bible's principals of economics -- working, saving and giving. Discipline and accountability for spending are ignored. Gambling preys on the weakness of others.

Let me mention here that entering free sweepstakes or drawings are not sinful as they are advertising ploys paid for by the sponsors. They use these to advertise their products while giving their customers a chance to win in a drawing. There is no gambling involved as the participants give no money for a chance to win the prize.

However, many Christians are guilty of supporting lotteries, bingo, horse racing, and even playing at the casinos. Video poker has become so popular it is now referred to as "the crack cocaine of gambling." Some do not realize the gravity of their sin. They justify gambling simply because they have needs that cannot be met through their present earned income. The Lord desires to meet those needs for them and will give them a plan for becoming debt free if they seek him and His economic principles in the Bible.

The Lord can bring deliverance to those caught in this web of compulsive gambling. Through admission of this sin and repentance God will break the bondage of it in those who desire to be set free. Gamblers need love and acceptance but they must repent in order to be free. The Lord loves those who are addicted to gambling and will help all that call upon Him for deliverance.


2 posted on 10/04/2005 11:43:22 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (My Homeland Security: Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
I know we can only excerpt the Washington Times, but the first sentence on page 2 of the Web version cannot go unnoticed -
But the president declined to say whether his father, former President George Bush, had erred in 1990 by appointing Justice David H. Souter, who was seen at the time as an easily confirmable "stealth nominee" but has proven more liberal than many expected....
Neither the WashTimes nor the FR live thread of the press conference (those are the two posts that note the question) has a clear expansion on that. However, the White House site does, and here's the exchange:
THE PRESIDENT: ...Baker. You're next.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. You said several times now, sir, that you don't want a justice who will be different 20 years from now than she is today. Given that standard, I wonder in hindsight whether you think the appointment of Justice David Souter, then, was a mistake? And even --

THE PRESIDENT: You're trying to get me in trouble with my father, Baker. (Laughter.)

Q Well, I'm trying to understand what informed your choice this time?

THE PRESIDENT: Call him. (Laughter.) Go ahead. Sorry to interrupt you.

Why doesn't this reassure me?
3 posted on 10/04/2005 11:49:07 PM PDT by steveegg (The quarterly FReepathon is the price you pay for FR...until enough people become monthlies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

My first impulse when Bush selected Harriet Miers was the same as Rush Limbaugh and many on this forum. The things in her past were like red flags which led me to disappointment and shock. I got over my 'knee jerk' reaction and calmly examined her history and, more importantly, the history of President Bush.

One was that she was a former democrat. As I recall, President Reagan was also a democrat before he saw the light, as were many of our southern politicians. They all turned out to become some of the most staunchest conservative Republicans in the party.

She donated money to a democrat ? Perhaps, but then many people who are the head of law firms donate money to both parties.

She stated that homosexuals should not be denied civil rights. How many of us would deny civil rights to any of our citizens? She didn't say that they should have the right to marry or adopt children. We leave that view to the left.

I know there are other areas in her life which will be under scrutiny by us on the right but the bottom line is, do we trust our President. In my opinion, we have seen the courage and commitment to conservative values which he has shown, over too many years, to abandon our faith in him now.


28 posted on 10/05/2005 4:53:52 AM PDT by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that made abortion a constitutional right.

For the next liberal that tries to claim they are not wanting judges to legislate from the bench. From this, it appears the Supreme Court can ammend the constitution, completely bypassing the legislative and ratification process.

31 posted on 10/05/2005 5:05:30 AM PDT by IamConservative (Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times will pick himself up and carry on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
.............remember, she was part of the search committee that helped pick Roberts," he said. "She knows exactly the kind of judge I'm looking for.

So, are you telling us Mr. President that she selected herself?

40 posted on 10/05/2005 8:19:57 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Remember: President will likely get 2 more nominations during his term (Stevens & Ginsburg)

Stealth candidate helps to keep his powder dry and/or flush out the Dims' strategery

Currently, lower level Fed courts may be crucial for existing caseload

His record of judicial appointments is very strong so far

Don't play poker with this man

The real battles will come later (in time for the 2006 elections)

46 posted on 10/05/2005 2:52:50 PM PDT by Thom Pain ("Was it succulent?" <long pause> "No, I chewed it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson