Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
I've just read the whole bloody thing and cannot find anything that limits speech, only things that limit spending. i checked both the links you suggested and they both focus on spending ,not speech.

***************

I am no authority, but it is my understanding that speech is limited by the limiting of spending.

922 posted on 10/05/2005 8:37:25 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]


Reaction to Will's column:

Responding to Will[two defenses of Miers on NR's 'Bench Memos']

923 posted on 10/05/2005 8:37:48 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat ("I'm quitting the GOP! (Again!)" - Eeyore. Join the Self-Annointed Martyr Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 922 | View Replies ]

To: trisham

"I am no authority, but it is my understanding that speech is limited by the limiting of spending."

I guess my feeling is that freedom of speech is a higher right than freedom of advertising

That just gives too much advantage to the wealthy, IMO. And if there were no limits on corporate spending then candidates wouldn't even need money from the public - that would be bad.

Maybe the current restrictions are wrong or too much. But I don't believe there is a constitutional right to advertising.

And I don't see how conservatives who are supposed to be strict constructionists could argue that there is.


937 posted on 10/05/2005 10:04:46 AM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 922 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson