If one lone poster can tick off enough supposed Conservatives, so that they play dog in the manger/ sit home and not vote, damned "purists", then just HOW Conservative and politically savvy were they to begin with?
"If one lone poster can tick off enough supposed Conservatives, so that they play dog in the manger/ sit home and not vote, damned "purists", then just HOW Conservative and politically savvy were they to begin with?"
If brains were 3-in-1 oil, these guys wouldn't have enough to grease the dynamo in a firefly's butt.
Purists? I take it that means you're impure? The lib phrases are pathetic. We call it conservatism. If we were purists, we would never have voted for Bush in 2004, given spending, illegal immigration, and so forth. But there is a point where you draw the line, if you are a conservative, or principled, for that matter. Where do you draw the line?
If your control of the Senate is as tentative and unstable as you say, then why don't you and your ilk tone down your attacks on purist conservatives who dare to question this nominee?