Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flashbunny

I'm not attacking him, but I'll repeat my .02 from a thread this morning ... does a revolt on the right which results in the defeat of this nomination, and IMHO that's where the revolt would come from as signaled by Mr. Will and others, not do irreparable damage to President Bush and pretty much put his administration into lame-duck status from here on out?


23 posted on 10/04/2005 7:42:05 PM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: GB

Yes, you are 100% correct.


49 posted on 10/04/2005 7:49:20 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: GB

I support W and Miers.....but this is a maelstrom, maybe she should withdraw.


78 posted on 10/04/2005 8:00:04 PM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: GB

I think once the initial knee jerk reaction has subsided and people learn more about Miers, the backlash will dissipate. Miers is an originalist, but she did not meet some people's expectations in regards to other attributes. She does however meet the most important quality: she is an originalist.


136 posted on 10/04/2005 8:21:06 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: GB
As Rush stated, this pick was made from weakness. And I add, by so doing, President Bush contributes to his own lame duckness.

If the nomination is defeated and President Bush picks a stellar nominee, he will redeem himself and reinvigorate his presidency.

222 posted on 10/04/2005 8:45:42 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (A Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: GB

No, a revolt on the right is precisely what we need to save the congress in '06. The Congressional Republicans need to insist Bush pull the nomination so we can keep the Congress in GOP hands.


274 posted on 10/04/2005 9:04:10 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: GB
does a revolt on the right which results in the defeat of this nomination, and IMHO that's where the revolt would come from as signaled by Mr. Will and others, not do irreparable damage to President Bush and pretty much put his administration into lame-duck status from here on out?

Wouldn't Lame Duck status be the best thing for a President who would otherwise just inflict further damage for the remainder of his term?

Even a Lame Duck President still has the power of the veto. Perhaps Bush would finally start using it as a last vestige.
Or perhaps the GOP can be shaken back to its senses and refocus itself and discover a new synergy. Since the GOP controls 55 seats in the Senate, they unified around a re-dedication to conservativism, they could in fact rescue Bush from an already burgeoning Lame Duck status.
739 posted on 10/04/2005 11:35:25 PM PDT by counterpunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: GB

Bush took a master strategic course and a leading strategic change course at Harvard. It's all part of his strategic mind.


754 posted on 10/04/2005 11:44:49 PM PDT by ridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson