Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flashbunny
Would have been easier just to nominate someone whose real beliefs are there for all to see. But instead we see the result of 'strategery'.

Ug. Gang of 14, RINO's.....no Brown......Ug. Two Stealth nominee's...right leaning court.....ug. Big battle for third pick....ug.

35 posted on 10/04/2005 4:00:30 PM PDT by Decepticon (The average age of the world's great civilizations has been 200 years......(NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Decepticon
"..no Brown"

How do you know if you don't even try?

Which republicans are going to go on national tv badmouthing a black woman, daughter of a sharecropper, who is 50 times more qualified than they are?

And what happens if she gets denied?

Well, the president just goes back and nominates someone else. It's not "be approved the first time or you can't nominate another".

Plus, the fight, and if there was a denial, would have motivated the base for the 2006 elections.

Instead of getting a 100% sure conservative bet nominated, we get an unknown, "trust us on this" nominee - one recommended by the Harry Reid!

This is not how GWB said he would stock the supreme court if elected. He promised more judges like thomas and scalia, not the personal recommendations of the senate democratic leader.
53 posted on 10/04/2005 4:04:59 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson