LOL, not my style Levin.
He was sworn in 1988, and Casey came down in 1992 -- ok, 4 years.
Right, within 4 years a guy who was thoroughly vetted upheld a ruling that even the honest lefty high brow lawyers admit is garbage. 4 years!
With all due respect, your argument is illogical.
No, it's not. It's quite logical, the fact that you happen to disagree with my position doesn't make my logic bad, it just means we disagree. The idea that intimate knowledge of a person over a long period of time doesn't increase the likelihood of that POTUS being a better judge of that individual rather than relying on the Sunnunu's of the world is illogical.
For instance, Scalia was also interviewed, and he turned out to be very solid.
That he has.
You are joining a small chorus defending emotion over logic. That's ok, but that's what it is.
Hardly. I'm not accusing you of being overwhelmed by female hormones. But I will if you continue along this line. :-}
My book has example after example of cronies picked by presidents who were terrible.
Good book.
Ok - trust. Good test. Since you argue for this position, tell us what the president discussed with her about her judicial philosophy. He said they never discussed abortion. So, on what basis does he actually know her judicial philosophy, and when will he share it with his supporters? Or do we have to read minds in addition to trust???