Ann Coulter just took apart SCOTUS nominee on the Mike Rosen show (My report)

Ann Coulter's appearance on the Mike Rosen show, 850am KOA ^ | This morning, Mon. Oct. 4th | Report from Mike Rosen show

[sinkspur]

First, is that all members of the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote in the affirmative, and second that the GOP Senators will vote to affirm.

The last point is no "slam dunk."

Uh, I'd bet $100 that every GOP Senator will vote for Meirs.

[johnb838]

Go ahead, get it out of your system. Purging is good.

[Souled_Out]

"They're right wing lunatics and are no different then the fool... Mike Moore."

---

Yeah, those conservatives and Michael Moore are really part of the rightwing lunatic fringe.

I can't wait till they wake up and stop supporting the republican party so we can settle back into obscurity.

/sarcasm

It has been a while since I have read a more asinine remark. Try to find your Meds today and get back to reality.

[Springman]

I want to, I really want to. Right now, I'm just not sure if that President Bush said in the Silverdome, when I saw him last year will happen?

Maybe, I'll just have to cut the grass and think? Just don't need to listen/watch everything right now.

[Rutles4Ever]

Anyone who thinks that Roberts was not a brilliant choice is blind.

Where does Roberts stand on abortion? Does he believe the right to privacy exists in the constitution?

[kevao]

So, not knowing what a DU troll is makes me one?

I think he was just joking. See my 242 for your answer.

Also, is there an acronym guide out there? I get some of the easier ones like LOL, IMHO, and ROFLMAO, but that's about it.

Yes, there is a guide somewhere. Do a search; you'll find it. Also, don't forget to look up important terms like "series", "hugh" and "vey" (as in, "vey series and hugh!"), as well as "beeber" and "stune".

Good luck, and welcome to FR.

[OldFriend]

Flacking her book, Ann needs publicity any way she can get it.

Her opinion is irrelevant to me but I do wish someone would get her a sandwich.

[madconservative]

Sorry, I meant 178.

[A CA Guy]

I don't think so, she has to follow a certain path so the United States is seen as an unbiased middle party between Israel and the Palestinians.

Of course the Palestinians will keep doing terror and eventually they will cause an open war and when Israel wins, they can dictate the terms of peace.

I think things have to be played out where all the t's are crossed and all the i's are dotted. Then Israel will eventually be allowed to kick their butt IMO.

I think as Sec of State for America, she is handcuffed in a lot of ways. It isn't her she's representing out there.

[XJarhead]

Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

Ole Arlen already has stated he will not support for elevation any of the judges that were filibustered but eventually confirmed as part of the "Gang of 14" deal. So right off the bat, that means he won't support Brown, and the best you get is a vote out of committee with no recommendation.

That alone makes Ann's point laughable. If she'd have suggested Edith Jones, Michael Luttig, or someone who did not fall into that category, she'd have a better point. But picking someone whom you know will not get support instead is just plain dumb.

[bkepley]

The Bushbots are out in force today.

Why not argue the facts rather than stoop to childish name calling? Also, do a little google on where the term Bushbot originated.

[sinkspur]

Where does Roberts stand on abortion?

Nobody knows.

Does he believe the right to privacy exists in the constitution?

I believe he does, in the 4th amendment.

So what?

[b4its2late]

Coulter and Brett Bozelle going to be on with Hannity today on radio. Not sure what time yet.....

[Pippin]

"....I wish Laura Bush would lay off the cheeseburgers."

You saying Laura Bush is fat?

[A CA Guy]

I think it is obvious that knowing her ten or more years at arms length gives Bush a good knowledge about how she thinks.

Your acting like he is clueless about this woman and the situation is the exact opposite.

[Texasbound]

Thank you as well for a straight answer. I feel like I have to verbally walk on eggshells because I don't have a long record. I appreciate your kindness.

[ajolympian2004]

Great!

[OldFriend]

Maybe Ann is so hungry she thinks her foot is food.

[pangaea6]

That would be great BUT the partial birth abortion ban case is coming up this session and we can't have a nominee bogged down in a Senate fight and allowing OConnor to vote on this important case. That's one of my theories.

[Sir_Ed]

I just saw her friend interviewed of Fox News. She said "In Texas, we were all LBJ Democrats," then moved to the GOP as the Democrats got more liberal.

So...they were LBJ Democrats.

I remember LBJ, and he wasn't a Reagan Conservative by any means.

They also said that President Bush said "I never once talked with Harriet about abortion."

I am going to fight this horrible appointment tooth and nail, calling all my Conservative Pro-Life friends and urging them to call Conservative Senators...we deserved a heavyweight Constitutionalist and we got a lawyer, the type of which can be found in thousands of law firms across the country.

A Freeper said earlier "If another GOP president were looking for a Supreme Court Justice, would people have settled on Harriet Miers as the best choice?"

And, of course, the answer is NO!

It doesn't matter that she is a Christian, what matters is she's not one of the country's major Constitutional jurists...she's just President Bush's friend and ex-lawyer.

The Conservatives have been stabbed in the back by this choice.

"Read my lips, more Scalia and Thomas..."

NOT!

Ed