To: ARepublicanForAllReasons
Tell me, how reliable are the news sources that are saying diddly squat about this? I challenge their reliability. Hagman has an exclusive, and so WND is being sure to credit him. Time will tell. People say, "Let's wait and see" until someone comes out with news. Then its, "Let's hurry up and condemn," especially when its hot news not being discussed by the 'big boys'.
43 posted on
10/04/2005 4:52:02 AM PDT by
Arthur Wildfire! March
("They'll have to basically rip my fingers from this porch." com/focus/bloggers/1483977/posts)
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I tend to agree with you. It's phikapmom and her eyewitness sources, NEIN, and a few blogs. THAT"S IT!
The rest is up to the pajamahadeen, I guess. But we're all tinfoil freaks and Dan Rather isn't.
46 posted on
10/04/2005 4:54:46 AM PDT by
ovrtaxt
(Relying on the MSM for news is like using suppositories for recreational purposes.)
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
The same "big boys," no doubt, they also condemn for all their omissions and outright inaccuracies...
96 posted on
10/04/2005 8:15:47 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson