Posted on 10/03/2005 4:38:01 PM PDT by doug from upland
(Part 1)FR EXCLUSIVE: Breaking -- Major Newspaper Doing Blockbuster Story on Peter Paul and Hillary
Oct. 3, 2005
Doug from Upland
Reporting from Upland, CA
FReepers, we have this report exclusively for you first here on FreeRepublic, the political website of record. A major newspaper, the identity of which will be released later this week, will publish a blockbuster story on Sunday discussing donor Peter Paul and the beneficiary of his $1.9 million campaign contribution in 2000, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
We do not know yet the path the story will take, but in 8,000 words, Hillary is not going to be very happy. Hillary, Bill, and their powerful cadre of spinners and coverup artists have been unable to stop the story.
As Tom DeLay faced his second indictment today, the questions continue to be asked by Paul. Why has Hillary Clinton been allowed to file three false FEC reports? Why has no one attempted to bring her to justice? Why has the biggest campaign fraud on record not been above the fold on page one in major newspapers? Why has it not lead nightly news stories?
It is more than just Hillary who is involved. Bill Clinton, Ed Rendell and Terry McAuliffe are up to their eyeballs in this scandal. David Rosen, a low level functionary in Hillary's campaign, was up to his eyeballs, but a Los Angeles jury decided he was not the one to punish. Hillary 2000 Campaign treasurer Andrew Grossman, who signed all three of the fraudulent FEC reports, is up to his eyeballs in the scandal. Amazingly, Grossman has so far escaped indictment.
In 2001, prior to the due date of the final amended FEC report, attorney David Kendall was served on behalf of Hillary in Paul's unprecedented and historic civil suit against a former president and sitting senator for fraud and conspiracy. His client was provided with cancelled checks and invoices, along with a demand to declare the campaign contributions or return the money. For five years the massive coverup has continued. The civil case, after review by the California Supreme Court, is headed for a Los Angeles superior court early in 2006 where Hillary, Bill, and several others will be under oath. Many of the Hollywood elite who attended the gala fundraising concert in 2000 are on the witness list. It will be a civil trial to remember and may be the only thing standing in the way of Hillary becoming commander in chief.
The case against Tom DeLay may be esoteric and, although it may have pushed the envelope, may not have been criminal conduct. What Hillary did is clearly criminal, it is easy to understand, and it was done in broad daylight.
Where is New York's own Ronnie Earle? Where is a prosecutor with the guts to go after those who committed the mother of all campaign finance scandals?
SPECIAL NOTE: It is expected that the hard-hitting documentary INDICTING HILLARY will be released during the campaign of 2006. INDICTING HILLARY chronicles her massive campaign finance fraud, her continuing failure to obey the law, her refusal to amend three fraudulent reports, and the aiding and abetting of her criminal conduct by a former president, William Jefferson Clinton, a current governor/former DNC chairman, Ed Rendell, and the immediate past DNC chairman, Terry McAuliffe. Hillary, you'd better put some ice on that.
I have been asking the same question. If she gives it back without a fight, won't she be admitting that she knew it was wrong?
I think I let Tony know on the phone last week. Hey, Tony, did I let you know about the big story coming on Sunday about Peter Paul and Hillary? I'm keeping the newspaper's identity secret for a few more days.
What did Weasley and O'R say last night?
"...why do so many fear her (Hillary)?" Simple. Many Republicans (including freepers) are going to stay home in '08. That might just mean a win for Hill.
Your point is very well taken - but in the end I think most of us would rather hold our noses, take some anti-nausea medication and not allow Hillary in the same way Bill got in.
Open borders, out of control spending, a WH afraid of a wussy senate is enough to keep me home.
Except Hillary can not be allowed to be CIC.
I am not familar with the details of this case but politicians return campaign contributions all the time without major consequence. It seems to me there are only two reasons why "The Beast" wouldn't do it here; 1) she thinks it's clean money, or 2) it's the tip of an iceburg that would sink HILPAC or whatever slush fund she's running these days.
... still waiting to learn who killed Vince Foster
bump
Very true. Thanks for the reply!
Please add me to the ping list.
I think you may get some disagreement from Billary.
Thanks Doug, for all that you do.
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)
Thanks for the link. Most interesting. Note to self: watch Commander on ABC. (When is is on??)
ping list addition
I believe that Foster killed himself on White House grounds and that the body was moved so that his office was not sealed as a crime scene and they could pass off jurisdiction to the Park Police.
And there is the crux of this matter. Do you have enough ammo to prove this?
Prior to the final amended return in July of 2001, Peter filed his lawsuit against Hillary, Bill, et al. Kendall accepted service for her. Peter included copies of checks and invoices. She cannot say that she didn't know. She has allowed the fraud to stand for over four years.
"What did Weasley and O'R say last night?"
I have no idea, I saw the FNC O' advert for his upcoming program. That was enough for me not to bother wasting my time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.