I'm guessing the WaPo. They have published some very surprising right-handed articles of late. Probably worried about subscription rates that are dropping like a rock. Gee, that's too bad :)
Posted on 10/03/2005 4:38:01 PM PDT by doug from upland
(Part 1)FR EXCLUSIVE: Breaking -- Major Newspaper Doing Blockbuster Story on Peter Paul and Hillary
Oct. 3, 2005
Doug from Upland
Reporting from Upland, CA
FReepers, we have this report exclusively for you first here on FreeRepublic, the political website of record. A major newspaper, the identity of which will be released later this week, will publish a blockbuster story on Sunday discussing donor Peter Paul and the beneficiary of his $1.9 million campaign contribution in 2000, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
We do not know yet the path the story will take, but in 8,000 words, Hillary is not going to be very happy. Hillary, Bill, and their powerful cadre of spinners and coverup artists have been unable to stop the story.
As Tom DeLay faced his second indictment today, the questions continue to be asked by Paul. Why has Hillary Clinton been allowed to file three false FEC reports? Why has no one attempted to bring her to justice? Why has the biggest campaign fraud on record not been above the fold on page one in major newspapers? Why has it not lead nightly news stories?
It is more than just Hillary who is involved. Bill Clinton, Ed Rendell and Terry McAuliffe are up to their eyeballs in this scandal. David Rosen, a low level functionary in Hillary's campaign, was up to his eyeballs, but a Los Angeles jury decided he was not the one to punish. Hillary 2000 Campaign treasurer Andrew Grossman, who signed all three of the fraudulent FEC reports, is up to his eyeballs in the scandal. Amazingly, Grossman has so far escaped indictment.
In 2001, prior to the due date of the final amended FEC report, attorney David Kendall was served on behalf of Hillary in Paul's unprecedented and historic civil suit against a former president and sitting senator for fraud and conspiracy. His client was provided with cancelled checks and invoices, along with a demand to declare the campaign contributions or return the money. For five years the massive coverup has continued. The civil case, after review by the California Supreme Court, is headed for a Los Angeles superior court early in 2006 where Hillary, Bill, and several others will be under oath. Many of the Hollywood elite who attended the gala fundraising concert in 2000 are on the witness list. It will be a civil trial to remember and may be the only thing standing in the way of Hillary becoming commander in chief.
The case against Tom DeLay may be esoteric and, although it may have pushed the envelope, may not have been criminal conduct. What Hillary did is clearly criminal, it is easy to understand, and it was done in broad daylight.
Where is New York's own Ronnie Earle? Where is a prosecutor with the guts to go after those who committed the mother of all campaign finance scandals?
SPECIAL NOTE: It is expected that the hard-hitting documentary INDICTING HILLARY will be released during the campaign of 2006. INDICTING HILLARY chronicles her massive campaign finance fraud, her continuing failure to obey the law, her refusal to amend three fraudulent reports, and the aiding and abetting of her criminal conduct by a former president, William Jefferson Clinton, a current governor/former DNC chairman, Ed Rendell, and the immediate past DNC chairman, Terry McAuliffe. Hillary, you'd better put some ice on that.
Yeah…I knew you'd like that!
MSN.com has had the "Delay indicted" story on their front page since the day it happened. Normally, the page changes several times a day.
It could be a technical glitch. Or, it could be deliberate.
I'm convinced they rolled him up in a rug to get him out of the whitehouse. ;-)
If I had the O's email addy I would send him a link to pic. On second thought, he might take a trip down to that beach for checking things out. :>)
I'm on your side, Doug. And I'll be praying!
Hey, can I FReepmail you with my guess at who's doing the story *and* will you confirm or deny if I get it right?
OK Doug...lets ride it for all it's worth. Quite frankly sick of Dems getting off scott free and GOP walking the planks over squat. Clintons are teflon though it seems.
Bump to lose Whatzerface!!!
Good stuff, Doug. My only realpolitic qyestion is, will any of the fawning Hillary supporters care?
He is not going down but the civil trial could be very embarrasing to all these people.
Make your guess here for everyone to see.
Only the Senate can remove another Senator. The RATS will try to cover for her.
This story will give hope to other RATS who now see her as unbeatable int the primaries.
I'm guessing the WaPo. They have published some very surprising right-handed articles of late. Probably worried about subscription rates that are dropping like a rock. Gee, that's too bad :)
Just read through the entire complaint! Good stuff....will be following this closely.
Thanks for your hard work!
My guess is the reporterette who was at the trial this summer in California. Was she from the NYT?
Thanks for the ping!
Is this your way of telling me I'm wrong? Boo hoo.
So many indictments have been handed down against Bill and Hill, that it just doesn't matter any more. The public at large doesn't believe any of it....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.