What obscure point are you trying to make? Do you even know?"
If that's what you meant that that's what you should have said.
The point is that Warren had PLENTY of 'record' on various issues because he had been a public figure, and Governor of California, one of our largest states. OK, he changed on some of them, but at least he wasn't a cipher.
LOL!
I am confused here. What is the role of a Supreme Court Justice?
It is to interpret the Constitution. Period. No politics, no activism, no self importance.
The question is, can she do this? Because if you are all hoping that she will be an activist for the right, than you are no better than the activists on the left.