To: Al Simmons
I am confused here. What is the role of a Supreme Court Justice?
It is to interpret the Constitution. Period. No politics, no activism, no self importance.
The question is, can she do this? Because if you are all hoping that she will be an activist for the right, than you are no better than the activists on the left.
96 posted on
10/03/2005 3:45:24 PM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Because if you are all hoping that she will be an activist for the right, than you are no better than the activists on the left. That's exactly what they want. Someone who's in the bag.
103 posted on
10/03/2005 3:47:23 PM PDT by
HairOfTheDog
(Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
To: EQAndyBuzz
"I am confused here. What is the role of a Supreme Court Justice?
It is to interpret the Constitution. Period. No politics, no activism, no self importance.
The question is, can she do this? Because if you are all hoping that she will be an activist for the right, than you are no better than the activists on the left."
Interpreting the Constitution WOULD constitute 'judicial activism' as it would necessitate overturning 50+ years of liberal unconstitutional precedent....
109 posted on
10/03/2005 3:49:52 PM PDT by
Al Simmons
(The Choice in 2008 will be between Stalin and a Republican; Who will you help to elect?)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Well said. I hope you get "heard" through the hysteria that is going on.
183 posted on
10/03/2005 4:17:25 PM PDT by
alwaysconservative
(The original point and click interface was a Smith and Wesson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson