Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: surely_you_jest
Am I the only one who noticed that when introducing her, President Bush didn't use the term "...exceptionally well qualified to sit on the Highest Court of our nation." He said she was "...exceptionally well suited to sit on the Highest Court of our nation." Admission that only non-entities can make it past the Democrats in Congress? Or that the Supreme Court is not worth a fight?
7 posted on 10/03/2005 3:14:05 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
I believe it was phrased that way because Miers is utterly unqualified for the job, so to say otherwise would have been a lie.
14 posted on 10/03/2005 3:18:28 PM PDT by Turbopilot (Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur


He's opined on several occasions that his nominee would not have to be a sitting judge.


88 posted on 10/03/2005 3:42:20 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
"He said she was "...exceptionally well suited..."

You misheard. He said she was "well-Soutered".

166 posted on 10/03/2005 4:11:33 PM PDT by Tall_Texan ("Give me liver, Dee, or give me beef.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

A Party of One.
A Ship Without a Rudder.
Same $hit, Differnt Day.
I Win, You Win. (Thank's Bush)


352 posted on 10/03/2005 6:05:15 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson