You're criticizing Bush for appearing impure, looking bad, and cronyism, aka the ugly side of politics. I'm thinking that such criticism is a bit odd coming from a state well-known for its massive and incomparable appetite for pork (every other structure is the "Ted Stevens Memorial..."), which, beyond being in theory incompatible with conservatism, appears impure, looks bad, and is the ugly side of politics.
I hope you aren't a lawyer, or a teacher - as you clearly use unrelated and irrelevant facts to support your argument/thesis.
Do you have any point to make about the actual discussion at hand?