To: kcvl
This is odd. Ussually the charges are combined in one indictment. Why two? Why not do them both at same time?
6 posted on
10/03/2005 3:02:44 PM PDT by
Raycpa
To: Raycpa
Two, drags it out.
We'll never hear the end of it.
13 posted on
10/03/2005 3:11:55 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Raycpa
This is odd. Ussually the charges are combined in one indictment. Why two? Why not do them both at same time?Duh. It's Ronnie Earle. People laughed at the first indictment, so he decided to do a snowjob.
52 posted on
10/03/2005 3:37:29 PM PDT by
AmishDude
(Join the AmishDude fan club: "Great point." -- AliVertias; ":-) Very clever" -- MJY1288)
To: Raycpa
This is odd. Ussually the charges are combined in one indictment. Why two? Why not do them both at same time? More MSM coverage & it seems more damaging to do it this way probably. After all, the guy is making a movie of it!
55 posted on
10/03/2005 3:42:51 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: Raycpa
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson