1 posted on
10/03/2005 2:58:40 PM PDT by
kcvl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: kcvl
Just heard Gibson break this. Wonder if it was the same GJ?
Wonder if there is actually some evidence to support the charge this time....
2 posted on
10/03/2005 2:59:48 PM PDT by
prairiebreeze
(Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
To: kcvl
Just saw that. Let's hope more details come out soon...
3 posted on
10/03/2005 3:00:02 PM PDT by
Fury
To: kcvl
When it rains it pours, Republicans will get through this, after all what is the alternative, the Democrats.
4 posted on
10/03/2005 3:00:07 PM PDT by
jonsie
To: kcvl
Getting ready to tune in Brit now---
To: kcvl
This is odd. Ussually the charges are combined in one indictment. Why two? Why not do them both at same time?
6 posted on
10/03/2005 3:02:44 PM PDT by
Raycpa
To: kcvl
12 posted on
10/03/2005 3:10:36 PM PDT by
fidelio
To: kcvl
New?
as in
New and Improved. ;-)
16 posted on
10/03/2005 3:13:07 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: NormsRevenge; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; calcowgirl; rdb3; EveningStar
18 posted on
10/03/2005 3:14:05 PM PDT by
FOG724
(Down with the sickness - Disturbed)
To: kcvl
ooooh Gawd (eyes rolling)
19 posted on
10/03/2005 3:15:20 PM PDT by
RDTF
To: kcvl
they are saying it is a different grand jury
20 posted on
10/03/2005 3:15:22 PM PDT by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: kcvl
Looks like Earl realized that the first indictment would never make it past a judge so he decided to up the ante.
22 posted on
10/03/2005 3:15:58 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
To: kcvl
I wonder if somebody mixed up the April indictment of the other two guys (that indictment mentions money laundering on exactly the same facts as the conspiracy charge v. Delay of last week), with the Delay indictment.
Any news reports other than tee vee FoxNews?
23 posted on
10/03/2005 3:16:34 PM PDT by
Cboldt
To: kcvl
Oh man, this is so weak. Why doesn't Ronnie Earle go ahead and indict him for murder while he's at it?
This is goign to blow up in his face.
25 posted on
10/03/2005 3:17:12 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: kcvl
Sounds like the same old horse sh!t.
28 posted on
10/03/2005 3:18:38 PM PDT by
Sthitch
To: kcvl
Next summer this crap won't even matter.
29 posted on
10/03/2005 3:18:38 PM PDT by
Sybeck1
(chance is the “magic wand to make not only rabbits but entire universes appear out of nothing.”)
To: kcvl
They're already moving the "Giant Boob" award into Ronnie Earle's garage.
33 posted on
10/03/2005 3:20:07 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: kcvl
35 posted on
10/03/2005 3:21:18 PM PDT by
Black Tooth
(The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
To: kcvl; Howlin
Good grief.
Earle is to "indictments" what Klayman is to "FOIA".
Both are used only to gain $$$ support, not effect.
What a waste. The democratic party needs to start cutting and snorting Immodium AD, they got diarrhea for brains. Sheese.
To: kcvl
I'm reading at other sites that Earle is "taking back" the conspiricy charge and replacing it with this. What the heck is going on here?
44 posted on
10/03/2005 3:29:57 PM PDT by
Nexus
To: kcvl
This smacks of European countries charging President Bush and Rumsfeld with war crimes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson