Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: A Quest for Oil Collides With Nature in Alaska
New York Times ^ | October 2, 2005 | FELICITY BARRINGER

Posted on 10/03/2005 6:13:03 AM PDT by OESY

The 217,000 acres of windblown water and mottled tundra here on the North Slope of Alaska, separating Teshekpuk Lake from the Beaufort Sea, are home in summer to 50,000 to 90,000 migratory birds. This corner of Alaska's National Petroleum Reserve is also thought to be brimming with oil.

From the presidencies of Ronald Reagan through Bill Clinton, federal officials put the bird habitat off limits to oil development. But after federal geologists in 2002 quadrupled their estimate of the oil available here in the northeast quadrant of the reserve, the Bush administration proposed putting the whole area up for lease to oil and gas companies.

The move has touched off a fierce debate over whether new technologies can allow wildlife to coexist easily with oil exploration....

But Stan Senner, executive director of Audubon Alaska, dismisses the talk of balance. "Oil companies and the people who are promoting oil development will go where the oil is," Mr. Senner said "and they won't stop at anything to get it."

Just how much oil is in the northeast corner of the reserve is a matter of professional guesses, most of them the proprietary information of companies. In 2002, the United States Geological Survey gave a mean estimate of 9.3 billion barrels, compared with the Arctic refuge's mean estimate of 7.7 billion barrels. The oil is concentrated, the geologists said, in the northern third of the petroleum reserve, which includes Teshekpuk.

Interest in the oil potential of that section of the reserve has grown as the older fields in Prudhoe Bay have passed their production peaks.

The Trans-Alaska Pipeline, the centerpiece of the advanced infrastructure that supports oil development in this forbidding climate, carries only about half its capacity of oil on the 800-mile journey to the Gulf of Alaska from the Beaufort Sea....

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: anwr; nationalpetroleum; oil; tundra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last


An oil well sits in the midst on the mosquito-infested tundra wasteland on the northern coast of Alaska known as the National Petroleum Reserve. A majority of Alaskans, including the local Inupiat natives, favor drilling. Meanwhile, we have learned that the Trans-Alaska Pipeline has provided shelter for Caribou during birthing that has tripled the size of their herds.



American economic growth (read, jobs) should not be held hostage to anti-business politics intended to cripple energy production.


1 posted on 10/03/2005 6:13:04 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY
The caribou have fur coats to keep warm, the citizens of this country need energy to keep warm.

Let the left turn off their heating systems, unheat their pools, stop flying private jets, etc. so there will be sufficient energy for the rest of us.

Till then, let them SHUT UP and get out of the way.

2 posted on 10/03/2005 6:15:12 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
"A Quest for Oil Collides With Nature Liberal, Anti-Americanism in Alaska"
3 posted on 10/03/2005 6:15:53 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY


4 posted on 10/03/2005 6:17:57 AM PDT by looky hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

The proposed development would use 2000-5000 acres of the 19 million acre ANWR.

http://www.anwr.org/archives/what_is_anwr_and_where_is_the_coastal_plain.php


5 posted on 10/03/2005 6:19:50 AM PDT by hlmencken3 ("May you be inscribed and sealed for a good year.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
we have learned that the Trans-Alaska Pipeline has provided shelter for Caribou during birthing that has tripled the size of their herds.

A lot better than tripled. With 30 years of contact with oil development to go by, the industry has shown that caribou and oil fields can successfully co-exist. The Central Arctic Herd, which calves in the vicinity of the Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk, and Milne Point oil fields, has increased 900% from an estimated 3,000 animals in the early 1970s to 32,000 in 2002.

6 posted on 10/03/2005 6:19:59 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

Beat me to it.


7 posted on 10/03/2005 6:20:06 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
the citizens of this country need energy to keep warm.

And if that energy gets too expensive, they'll burn trees to stay warm. These greenies don't have enough synapses to rub together in order to think even a little bit ahead and consider the consequences of their ideology.

8 posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:15 AM PDT by EricT.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY

So paint the oil wells green and hang potted plants from them!


9 posted on 10/03/2005 6:25:09 AM PDT by airborne (My hero - my nephew! Sean is home! Thank you God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hlmencken3
This article is not talking about ANWR. It is the National Petroleum Reserve, Alaska (NPRA). It used to be called the Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4.

It has a comparable amount of oil as the ANWR coastal plain, but spread out of a much, much larger area.

U.S. Geological Survey 2002 Petroleum Resource Assessment of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPRA)

10 posted on 10/03/2005 6:25:20 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Has there ever been a major "environmental" disaster due to oil drilling, does anyone know? I think the dangers are overblown, the agenda lies elsewhere as usual, IMO.


11 posted on 10/03/2005 6:29:23 AM PDT by Sam Cree (absolute reality - Miami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

There has been spills in recent history. Disaster would depend on who you are talking to. On the North Slope, they are required to use a drip pan when fueling a vehicle. A drip falling on the ground must be prevented. Some environmentalists consider a gallon of oil a disaster, even in the areas where the oil naturally seeps to the surface.


12 posted on 10/03/2005 6:47:16 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The worst one I can think of was the Exxon Valdez. But even with that, I don't know what lasting damage was done, especially that can compare to the lasting damage of financing all those maniacs in the Middle East.


13 posted on 10/03/2005 6:51:09 AM PDT by Sam Cree (absolute reality - Miami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OESY

All eye wash. When gasoline goes above $6, a roar of outraged consumers will make the Ecofreaks run for the hills and we'll start using our huge oil reserves.


14 posted on 10/03/2005 6:53:53 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

Exxon Valdez is far from the worst, just the most publicized. I took his question to be about spills in the area of drilling, not the transporation more than 1,000 miles away.


15 posted on 10/03/2005 6:54:34 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Stop the drilling! Save the black flies and the giant mosquitoes!


16 posted on 10/03/2005 6:59:02 AM PDT by an amused spectator (If Social Security isn't broken, then cut me a check for the cash I have into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

My question *was* about in the area of drilling, just the Valdez was the one that I know about. Also, I hadn't realized that it was 1,000 miles from the drilling point.


17 posted on 10/03/2005 7:03:08 AM PDT by Sam Cree (absolute reality - Miami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

The whole environmental anti oil thing started in the 1960's when Union Oil was drilling offshore in the Santa Barbara Channel. As I recall, the well kicked and the BOP (Blow Out Protector)didn't work to stop the blowout. This was caused by some lame brained idiot who installed the BOP stack upside down!!

Many poor birds met an untimely gooey end.


18 posted on 10/03/2005 7:21:06 AM PDT by PlanoMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PlanoMike

Just had a Senior Moment! Make that "Blow Out Preventer" not "Blow Out Protector"!!


19 posted on 10/03/2005 7:25:47 AM PDT by PlanoMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EricT.

The Chappaquidick/Chappaqua crew would rather see trees burn than wind mills in their view.


20 posted on 10/03/2005 7:46:53 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson