OK, I'm glad you admit that you are working with the same information as us mere mortals.
Given that, I see two left-wing organizations on her resume, that she's been a trial lawyer, and has run a lottery. What about these few pieces of information available give you any reason to hope that she will be different from O'Connor or Souter?
Yes, I admitted that; but I also pointed out I'm not jumping to conclusions and spreading falsehoods based on my interpretations of readings of pseudo-facts on this thread.
A claim you cannot make.
What about these few pieces of information available give you any reason to hope that she will be different from O'Connor or Souter?
Because George W. Bush has known her for almost 20 years and he NOMINATED her. DUH.
One other thing. She has managed a very large and obviously therefore a very ideologically diverse law firm.
This is impressive as a professional credential.
But you don't get positions like that by being a committed conservative or, for that matter, a flaming liberal. That just makes too many people mad.
You succeed in those types of environments by being a pragmatist, a compromiser, a go along to get along.
Again, while that is an impressive professional achievement, it is not exactly what those of us who held out for a Scalia/Thomas wanted.