Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Verdolini

""This is not the issue. The issue is, the president, OUR president, instead of picking a real, open conservative constitutional scholar, decided instead to pick a very nice lady absolutely lacking in Constitutional background that he happened to know. ""

It would appear that your assessment of the nominee might be correct, however with the dearth of information available, sounds like you have been following her for most of her career. How do you know about her? I would venture to say that 1000% more information will come out about her in the ensuing weeks than anyone on this board has now in their possession. I do not think we need a 'scholar', I absolutely agree, we need a strict constructionist. I am willing to trust the strategy on this one and not jump immediately to conclusions...


2,372 posted on 10/03/2005 12:18:53 PM PDT by InsureAmerica (Evil? I have many words for it. We are as dust, to them. - v v putin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2342 | View Replies ]


To: InsureAmerica

"I do not think we need a 'scholar', I absolutely agree, we need a strict constructionist. I am willing to trust the strategy on this one and not jump immediately to conclusions..."

That is the point. He HAD strict constructionists of great repute and constitutional scholars. He chose his lawyer.


2,418 posted on 10/03/2005 12:48:20 PM PDT by Jim Verdolini (We had it all, but the RINOs stalked the land and everything they touched was as dung and ashes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2372 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson