Replies

It's disconcerting to see so many fence-straddlers jumping on this cause only because Hillary Clinton revealed her true nature. You know she wouldn't have done so without teams of paid tools assuring her that she'd be able to get away with it with minimal repercussion. THAT's what worries me - the American people drawn from law and order to feel-good anarchism. The Queen Bitch is definitely trying to set up the chess board for her future rule under all the wrong rules.

If it really comes down to her or a slightly lesser evil Republican I'd have no choice but to vote for the Republican. In the meantime I promote less corrupted parties like the Constitution. We'll never be rid of the define-less "lock-ins" unless we threaten their hold on power. I consider threatening that hold a patriotic duty. We need a viable third party to gain strength now before the two-faced singular party rewrites the rules to forbid any chance of opposition.

They're going down the path of bread and circuses without insuring continued viability. Our economy, sustained on the illusion of a non-backed currency, can not withstand any challenge to that illusion. I've read and reread Greenspan's speeches and conclude that it's all horse manure designed to reassure business-people to carry on business as usual when they should actually be motivated toward building concrete resources, saving money and minimizing dependence on foreign resources. I've said all along that we should be able to perform anything needed in our own country because war dous'nt tell you beforehand that the substance you critically needed shouldn't have been "outsourced". We need an office of oversight - people looking out for our butts with enforcement power to make it so. Bill Clinton started the trend of selling out our intellectual resources and today we have a China ready to kick our butts 20 years before they should have been a threat.

A new Committee of UnAmerican Activities, please. William Clinton, Theodore Kennedy, step up to the scafold.